hmm.. that'd be a good song title

attempting to pay for it and blaming it on being racially pressured to do it when you get caught is, though.

You might say that the fact that he approached the man first about sex would explain away his defense that he felt pressured by the black men. But you have to keep in my that he's all about the pre-emptive strike. He's a pro-active dude.

As his mom used to tell him: when it doubt, suck a dick.

Maybe he was just wanted to experiment if he could brake his law. It is a good law he made no doubt about it.

which law? "no suckin' dickz in the park?" i'd buy that for a dollar.

Read the bottom.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbe..._his_ar_1.html

They just BLOW up every once in a while and go a little crazy.

hilariously uproarious


Yeah, that's how I read CHOUT's post too.

Offering $20 to give oral sex to anyone in a bathroom stall is pretty fucking repressed, and just plain pathetic.

Sure, but in a bathroom stall for $20? That's the definition of repressed. I see nothing repressed about giving oral sex to either gender, but if you feel like you have to offer someone money to convince them to let you get them off, that's repression, or at least major lack of self confidence. And in a bathroom stall? I really sounds like someone with self esteem issues to me, unless something really big has changed in this exciting new millenium I missed.

No what I meant by repressed, is they feel they cannot do these things, because it is not right what society(republicans) think.

Well, I do rather like listening to Barry Manilow really loud with my car windows rolled down. Especially "I Can't Smile Without You".

Well, that guy is massively stupid.