Diablo II lacked the substance and anything relevant and was essentially quite shit, but I still played the fuck out of it.
I think it's been obvious for years that they'll be making diablo III at some point.

lol.

I think Diablo 1 had everything you want from Diablo. The Diablo 2 came along with the larger story and bigger world. Fuck that. Clicking on monsters is what MAKES Diablo. That is what I expect. Repetitious clicking. And loot. And beautiful acoustic music.

Stay a while and listen.

diablo 1 was basically an old school scrolling beat em up (i.e. extremely repetitive), except you could change your clothes all the time.

I enjoy repetition, even with music. One thing done well should be repeated three times after, at least.

The stoy in Diablo 1 is dull ( the 3 brothers , all that )
The one in Diablo 2 is even worse , I didn't even try to get it , and hardly listen to the dialogues in the cinematics.

Diablo 1 was awesome. Then, now, and forever.

the wow geeks have been in a tither about the splash sceen on the main site for a week. It started out as solid ice and broke apart slowly.

Blizzard was waiting to announce it at their Warcraft invitational in Paris.

It looks really awesome, but like the other Diablos, its mostly just a hack n slash game.


ps: D2 sucks without the expansion. With it, its pretty badass.

Wow, every other post in this thread is mine. What a fucking nerd.

The only good innovation in Diablo II was the gem thing that could improve your weaponry and armor. The rest was boring crap.

I thought that you didn't buy the expansion. or are you trying to say tha d2 sucked so bad that you just bought the expansion??

yes, I have beaten the secret cow level and stolen the cow king's hide.

nope, I do not own the expansion. but i doubt it's so radically better than the regular game.

unless they introduced a pity-patch, the expansion was the only way you could get sockets.

yes, secret cow!!

It plays and looks very much like Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance.