Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonic Sounds (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   LULU (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=59783)

Genteel Death 11.06.2011 07:09 AM

We worked really hard, you know? I'm not even getting paid to be this right.

Derek 11.06.2011 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mortte Jousimo
Well I think St. Anger and LULU differs like day and night (I think St. Anger is just great), but of course itīs a wrong opinion, because I donīt belong into SYG-cream.

Adam Cooley loved St. Anger and he has the most posts than anyone here.

But you should maybe actually hear the whole thing before passing judgement on it like you're doing. I'm tired of people hearing several songs from something and making a collective opinion based on that when really most albums can only be assessed once you've experienced the whole thing in order. And this album works well as an album which is something I've not heard many reviews mention (possibly because their main mantra was, "Lou Reed and Metallica? BAHAHA!").

Genteel Death 11.06.2011 07:14 AM

kapitalism & listening to records

Derek 11.06.2011 07:17 AM

I don't read gast30's threads because they just make my blood boil with their incoherence.

Genteel Death 11.06.2011 08:10 AM

I don't dislike his posts. I just think they're too much for me at any given time. I suppose there is space for everyone.

Derek 11.06.2011 09:43 AM

His posts are okay when I take the time to figure out what he's actually saying but I'm too busy doing nothing to do this often.

Glice 11.06.2011 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mortte Jousimo
I havenīt heard the whole record, but what Iīve heard it sound to me miserable. Lyrics may be great, but the way Lou "sings" them is miserable. I also like some music that I consider perverse, but I donīt think this is perverse. But of course everybody have own opionions about whatīs perverse.


I suppose it's a question of where you're coming from. I don't imagine many dyed-in-the-wool Metallica fans are ever going to like Lulu. It's not really for them (not that metalheads can't/ don't listen to other things - I mean a specific, metal-centric perspective that's not interested in other things). I think Reed's singing is rough, but he's not in his 20s any more, and he's fucked himself up. He struggles to hold a note these days. But the inability to sing well doesn't mean he shouldn't. Everyone loved Cash's late records, and his voice is fucked there. But if you look at Lulu in a similar way to something like Jandek or David Tibet - two divisive voices if ever there were... - Reed isn't letting his physical limitations stopping him, he's actually using them - to emphasise the lyrics, to act with contrary melody to the (quite poppy) Metallica arrangements.

I don't mean perverse in terms of the lyrics, by the by - I'm a long way from thinking that S/m lyrics are interesting in themselves. I mean in terms of a few contingent things - getting a very boorish metal band playing very boorish arrangements over some very feminist lyrics; having very flat, standard metal riffs coupled with outré arrangements; Having a man in his late-60s singing from the perspective of a pre-teen girl. That sort of thing.

Regards what Derek said about actually listening to things - I think that's what I like about this record. A lot of the time a brief listen doesn't give you much more than an idea of some influences, a bit of how people structure things etc etc. What really surprised me about Lulu was how ugly it seemed from the outset. Making a record that's immediately repulsive, rather than just insipid (say, Mumford and Sons) is quite an achievement. It is an ugly record, but that's an important aesthetic, and one that's definitely pretty shocking in 2011.

Regarding the 'SYG elect' comment - no-one here in the 'elect' (assuming you mean the top 20 or so posters) agrees with each other on anything. It's not a secret club, it's just a load of people talking shite. Some have talked more shite than others. I certainly don't agree with most people on most things, but I also don't care. It's a question of how you deal with disagreements, not a circle-jerk franchise.

Derek 11.06.2011 10:40 AM

Some of the tracks that aren't that interesting work in the album's context which is something you're not going to pick up from previewing the songs. 'The View' is possibly the worst song on there but I could appreciate it a lot more after listening to it's preceding track which is supposed to set it up. I'm just tired of instant judgements people make which is possibly a catalyst from the internet age. I hated the Kanye West songs 'POWER' and 'Monster' but when I gave it's respective album a good listen it became one of my favourite hip hop albums of all time and even came to enjoy those songs a lot more than I did when it was stripped from it's context.

Granted, this isn't going to happen in all cases. But I think it's more if the artist is album-centric (which Metallica and almost definitely Lou Reed are).

Genteel Death 11.06.2011 12:11 PM

Derek being totally gangsta on this thread. Can't rep him.

!@#$%! 11.06.2011 01:16 PM

oh man i heard once the edgar allan poe "musical narrative" by lou read-- was it the raven i can't remember-- and it was awful in spite of the star-studded cast (i think steve buscemi read one part).

here i don't predict anything good but metallica sounds good in the background-- at least until the singer opens his mouth.

metal bands should give up vocals completely, like pelican.

Derek 11.06.2011 01:45 PM

Mattin's take on the album:


Quote:

The beauty of our times: this record is the most hated record ever and it has only just been released. Lou Reed and Metallica took a risk and Lulu is generating some of the most passionate and intelligent writing on the internet. For sure the cruelty of the reviews matches the cruelty of the record. Both seem to be an ethnographic study of our times. One of the reviewers said that Lou Reed and Metallica are amongst the most perverse musicians around. Why do people get surprised when they get the ultimate perverse record? So perverse that you cannot take it? There is a famous saying in downtown New York which goes: if you are a Lou Reed fan you must be ready to go all the way. Yes, he is going to take you to places that you have never dreamed of, even in your worst nightmares.If you are a Lou Reed fan you go through shit, shit records, shit playing, shit covers, shit lyrics... He takes you psychologically to the wild side even if you might be comfortably playing the record in your cosy home with a cup of tea. He is going to make you reconsider your values of judgement to the core and beyond. Once you go through this then you might agree with Lou when he says about Lulu: "This thing is the best thing ever done by anybody". And he insists in an interview that he is not being egotistical. I am a Lou Reed fan and I believe him. When Lou does something he puts himself into it 100% and as we know this is too much for the majority of human beings, from his solo on “I Heard Her Call My Name” that made him the best guitarist ever by bridging feedback noise rock with a Coleman free jazz sensitivity to Metal Machine Music where the guitar did not even need a guitarist (artistic de-subjectification probably taken from Warhol's filmmaking: he didn't need to be behind the camera). But here we get a blunt and confident Lou Reed happy to have a partner to rock with. And this is what Lou Reed and Metallica are becoming: Rock'n'roll animals in the perverted zoo of the internet. Yes, Lulu is about sex. It is a 69 between Lou Reed and Metallica. Lou's tongue is a chainsaw with rusted links (for infection and maximum durability). Metallica gets cut in two and will never recover. They say in interviews that now that they have discovered improvisation with Lou they will implement it on their 10th record. Who knows, maybe next year Metallica will play at the Konfrontatitonen festival? Lou has previously made amazing noise with the guitar but that has already made it into the proper canon of Noise (as an established genre of music). Now he uses his voice as a device for achieving unreified noise which still contains alienation. But this is not concrete poetry, somehow it sounds even seems more abstract, it is relentless, beautifully out of tune and it hurts. And then the lyrics: sniff your shit in the wind, coloured dick, pathetic little dog... these sentences are snubs to any form of taste. Reed lyrics achieve a level of vulgarity so brilliant that it will probably beat the number of quotes that a single record can get on the internet. Yes, James, you are a table, where Lou can rest his fuckin' feet on. What Lulu produces is a radical equalisation: a teenage Metallica cover band are the backing group to a drunken 100 year old ranting about how viciously prostituted a prostitute was who he met when he was 14 while angels in furs play violins and the neighbourhood dudes in a basement are making noise while looking at amateur German porn which contains some scatological moments. In fact on this record you get the whole canon of interesting music: drone wrong, Henry Chopin-style language deconstructions, improv-thrash, heavy literary cock rock, contemporary classical Brainbombs, geriatric-metal... The headfuck continues with the gender politics: what could be more queer than a young feminist girl shouting for sexual liberation in the body of an old male Jew with cut legs and tits? (Whether this body has sperm or not is another question...) Lulu is more Lou Reed than Lou Reed and that surely means that this is the best thing ever done by anybody.
http://www.volcanictongue.com/columns/show/17

Mortte Jousimo 11.06.2011 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek
Adam Cooley loved St. Anger and he has the most posts than anyone here.

But you should maybe actually hear the whole thing before passing judgement on it like you're doing. I'm tired of people hearing several songs from something and making a collective opinion based on that when really most albums can only be assessed once you've experienced the whole thing in order. And this album works well as an album which is something I've not heard many reviews mention (possibly because their main mantra was, "Lou Reed and Metallica? BAHAHA!").


You are right, I should listen the whole record. But if I listen all the records recommend here, I wonīt have time to do anything else (maybe even sleeping). But anyway I will listen LULU someday, but not very soon, because I donīt still believe I will like it (of course something like that has happened that I start to like record that at first has sounded very miserable).

Mortte Jousimo 11.07.2011 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glice
I suppose it's a question of where you're coming from. I don't imagine many dyed-in-the-wool Metallica fans are ever going to like Lulu. It's not really for them (not that metalheads can't/ don't listen to other things - I mean a specific, metal-centric perspective that's not interested in other things). I think Reed's singing is rough, but he's not in his 20s any more, and he's fucked himself up. He struggles to hold a note these days. But the inability to sing well doesn't mean he shouldn't. Everyone loved Cash's late records, and his voice is fucked there. But if you look at Lulu in a similar way to something like Jandek or David Tibet - two divisive voices if ever there were... - Reed isn't letting his physical limitations stopping him, he's actually using them - to emphasise the lyrics, to act with contrary melody to the (quite poppy) Metallica arrangements.

I don't mean perverse in terms of the lyrics, by the by - I'm a long way from thinking that S/m lyrics are interesting in themselves. I mean in terms of a few contingent things - getting a very boorish metal band playing very boorish arrangements over some very feminist lyrics; having very flat, standard metal riffs coupled with outré arrangements; Having a man in his late-60s singing from the perspective of a pre-teen girl. That sort of thing.

Regards what Derek said about actually listening to things - I think that's what I like about this record. A lot of the time a brief listen doesn't give you much more than an idea of some influences, a bit of how people structure things etc etc. What really surprised me about Lulu was how ugly it seemed from the outset. Making a record that's immediately repulsive, rather than just insipid (say, Mumford and Sons) is quite an achievement. It is an ugly record, but that's an important aesthetic, and one that's definitely pretty shocking in 2011.

Regarding the 'SYG elect' comment - no-one here in the 'elect' (assuming you mean the top 20 or so posters) agrees with each other on anything. It's not a secret club, it's just a load of people talking shite. Some have talked more shite than others. I certainly don't agree with most people on most things, but I also don't care. It's a question of how you deal with disagreements, not a circle-jerk franchise.

I donīt have no reason to like some album just because the major people thinks itīs repulsive, although I like many albums the most people find repulsive.

To me it seems lyrics are more important to you than music.

About "Syg Elect" always when there is more than one people doing something together begins some kind of society. And every society has hierachy, so it is also here in SYG.

Glice 11.07.2011 03:59 AM

Apparently you've not paid much attention to the bollocks I've spouted on here over the years. I find lyrics to mostly be bad, which is one of the reasons I like (some) Reed. I tend to focus on music more, but that's a bit pointless in the case of a band like Metallica - they don't do a great deal that's formally complex. It's mostly uppy downy diatonic stuff, from what I've gathered (and I'm not interested in listening to anything to prove me wrong).

In this case, the lyrics are very good, which puts the whole album in a different light.

It's not a question of other people finding it repulsive - that would be contrarianism - it's a question that Lulu is aesthetically quite jarring and awkward (which is a different sort of contingency).

The hierarchy is entirely your perception. Just call everyone a cunt. Go on, it'll be funny.

Mortte Jousimo 11.07.2011 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glice
Apparently you've not paid much attention to the bollocks I've spouted on here over the years. I find lyrics to mostly be bad, which is one of the reasons I like (some) Reed. I tend to focus on music more, but that's a bit pointless in the case of a band like Metallica - they don't do a great deal that's formally complex. It's mostly uppy downy diatonic stuff, from what I've gathered (and I'm not interested in listening to anything to prove me wrong).

In this case, the lyrics are very good, which puts the whole album in a different light.

It's not a question of other people finding it repulsive - that would be contrarianism - it's a question that Lulu is aesthetically quite jarring and awkward (which is a different sort of contingency).

The hierarchy is entirely your perception. Just call everyone a cunt. Go on, it'll be funny.

I have no need to start bark you or analyze you more. I just say most of you in "inner circle" are quite sick. Hope you get help yourself at least sometime in your life. And if you want to bark me, just go on, I donīt also have any need to read this thread anymore.

Glice 11.07.2011 07:46 AM

Ah, the old amateur psychologist line. Always a winner, that one.

I was only twying to bee yowar fweeeend...

Again, there is no inner-circle. There's a load of people who have too much time on their hands and/ or enjoy forumming. Come on, it's hardly like forums are a new phenomenon. Get with the system, man...

Derek 11.07.2011 01:30 PM

There is an inner circle and it only contains me.

Glice 11.07.2011 01:39 PM

Your ringpiece doesn't count as a clique dear. More an aspiration.

Hang on, you're 18 now, right? Ignore the above.

sy2004 11.07.2011 01:50 PM

how low could they go?

Derek 11.07.2011 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glice
Your ringpiece doesn't count as a clique dear. More an aspiration.

Hang on, you're 18 now, right? Ignore the above.

I will be saving this incase I have to supply evidence in court at a later date.

Glice 11.07.2011 05:44 PM

There's no evidence in a court of love. Just love. And a smell you just can't place.

knox 11.07.2011 05:49 PM

Dear Glice,

Join our party.

lots of love,
queen witch knox

Genteel Death 11.07.2011 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mortte Jousimo
I havenīt heard the whole record, but what Iīve heard it sound to me miserable. Lyrics may be great, but the way Lou "sings" them is miserable. I also like some music that I consider perverse, but I donīt think this is perverse. But of course everybody have own opionions about whatīs perverse.

I assume that with ''miserable'' in this case you mean ''not pleasant to the ear''. Lou Reed's voice has never really sounded pretty to my ears, but somehow he's got a way of intoning words which I've always found interesting. And on his best music it really works. I'd say his voice is overall at its most pleasant on ''Transformer'', ''Berlin'' and some songs on ''Coney Island Baby''. Over the years the same voice turned from coldly flat to plain dull-sounding and kind of forced, where before it had a spiteful, and occasionally mantric quality to it I could appreciate. I think on this record he started playing with it again for the first time in many years. It's genuinely angry and grotesque sounding, like your most feared uncle when he turns up completely drunk at the family christmas gathering, and suddenly he playfully tries to strangle you. That kind of WTF factor. Reed on top form does the WTF thing better than you and me. Boo woo!

ann ashtray 11.07.2011 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genteel Death
I assume that with ''miserable'' in this case you mean ''not pleasant to the ear''. Lou Reed's voice has never really sounded pretty to my ears, but somehow he's got a way of intoning words which I've always found interesting. And on his best music it really works. I'd say his voice is overall at its most pleasant on ''Transformer'', ''Berlin'' and some songs on ''Coney Island Baby''. Over the years the same voice turned from coldly flat to plain dull-sounding and kind of forced, where before it had a spiteful, and occasionally mantric quality to it I could appreciate. I think on this record he started playing with it again for the first time in many years. It's genuinely angry and grotesque sounding, like your most feared uncle when he turns up completely drunk at the family christmas gathering, and suddenly he playfully tries to strangle you. That kind of WTF factor. Reed on top form does the WTF thing better than you and me. Boo woo!


Agree with everything. Street Hassle is really good too, I think.

tesla69 11.08.2011 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genteel Death
this particular record is bolder and more daring than anything Animal Collective - the first ''cool'' band that popped up into mind - have ever done. In that respect I don't understand why it's getting slated so much. Some of the lyrics are brilliant. In a couple of songs I find them even brutally sad. As you may already know, there aren't that many great lyricists in rock music at the moment.


Slagged especially by people who haven't listened to it or only heard a 10 second snippet - but thats what passes for opinion these days.

It probably did not need to be a double CD, however...

I think Lou's wife told him to do this, she's a pop culture mastermind and knows this will keep in him in the public eye.

And to anyone who says Lou hasn't done anything value since the 70's, if you haven't listened to his CD with his wife recorded at The STone then you don't know what you are talking about.

pad_023 11.08.2011 08:02 PM

They played White Light/White Heat on Jools Holland

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSQAv...layer_embedded

It's so bad, Hetfield probably is the most comical man in music though

Murmer99 11.08.2011 08:33 PM

it isn't that impressive but I don't think it deserves all the bashing it's been getting.

fugazifan 11.08.2011 09:36 PM

yeah, i actually kind of liked the white light white heat thing, at least i like the way that lou reed sang on it.

Genteel Death 11.30.2011 02:40 AM

 

sy2004 11.30.2011 04:13 AM

A perfect review of this thing some call an album:

Quote:

The life cycle of Metallica can easily be compared with that of a company. As start-up they were bursting with energy and enthusiasm and launched three breakthrough products that established their name. After an unexpected personnel change, the direction shifted slightly, but "…And Justice For All" was still very good and propelled them to international success. The 'Black' album promoted Metallica to global corporate and since then consolidation has become the standard. The enthusiasm and genuine creativity from the early years became a rare feature. In the 21st century, the conglomerate Metallica survived a monstrous product (‘St. Anger’) but rehabilitated themselves with ‘Death Magnetic’. Thanks to the massive downloading and fragmentation within the hard rock and metal genre, no band managed to oust Metallica from their throne as most popular metal band. A joint venture with Lou Reed needs to help Metallica’s fight against their faltering creativity.

Analogous to a global advertising campaign, the tension has been carefully built up by first releasing the concept and photographs by Anton Corbijn release, then the cover design, and finally the names of the songs and their lyrics. On paper, the cooperation between elderly rock rebel Lou Reed and Metallica looked at least intriguing. The story from 1913 by the German playwright Frank Wedekind about the life of an abused dancer seemed to provide sufficient points for a great musical adventure. Guitarist Kirk Hammett raised expectations by stating that the band has been spontaneous for the first time in twenty years and gave the album high marks for creativity. Now the album is finally, we can own judge ourselves.

‘Brandenberg Gate’ kicks off the double album with a rather slow beat. Lou Reed’s recitative presentation of the lyrics requires some adjustment, but after several spins still proves to more a nuisance than an enhancement. A talking Lou Reed is however bearable, his singing voice is downright awful. He sings out of tune and often appalling bad. ‘The View’ sounds like a recording from Metallica’ garage days sessions. Basically it is just a collection of riffs that go nowhere and sounds like a warming up tune by a roadie. Reed’s vocals are again terrible. As soon as Hetfield takes over the vocals the song becomes enjoyable. ‘Pumping Blood’ has a trademark staccato riff and an intermezzo in which Reed reads his poetry-like lyrics. After some experimental drumming the song ends in a mess. On ‘Mistress Blood’ we hear a thrash riff that could have come off ‘Kill em all’. Unfortunately Reed’s vocal performance again ruins everything. On the fifth song the bar is set even lower with a bunch of chords that sound like practice material for new songs. ‘Cheat On Me’ has a slow start, develops into a soundscape during which Lou Reed reads aloud. Not until the final quarter the song kicks into motion. The eight minutes that follow are aptly called ‘Frustration’. The next low point is called ‘Little Dog’ and is extremely boring. Is this the band that once ignited the Aardschokdag festival and released classics like ‘Ride The Lightning’ and ‘Master of Puppets’? ‘Dragon’ is one of the most experimental songs and starts so bad that you’re running to the skip-button. It’s just resonance with the out of tune voice of Reed. The second half of the song is better, but way too monotonous. ‘Junior Dad’ closes this epic failure in style.

Metallica deserves credit for this bold step, but also massive criticism for the disappointing and downright awful results. A positive point is the production. Metallica hasn’t had a production in which guitar, bass and drums sounded sharp, deep and clear in quite some time. Such a production would have made ‘Death Magnetic’ a lot stronger. This is not the avant-garde masterpiece we hoped for, but unbearable garbage. This is audio food for masochists. The band reputation is down the drain (again) and they will have to come up with a very strong album to wash the aftertaste of this epic failure away.

http://www.lordsofmetal.nl/showrevie...=20224&lang=en

candymoan 11.30.2011 04:21 AM

"i am the table..."

TheMadcapLaughs 11.30.2011 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candymoan
"i am the table..."


u know everyone talks shit on that line but is it really any worse than Ļiīm the cocker on the rock....Ļ

candymoan 11.30.2011 05:27 AM

nah...
it's just that hetfield had been taking himself far too seriously and it's nice to see that change..

it's not only about the message per se, but the delivery kills me each time i hear it..

Genteel Death 04.03.2012 11:01 PM

This album brings back talking about characters, and Lou Reed is good at writing about characters. Imagine, in a world where almost everyone is so busy with talking about themselves, what it's like to observe and write about other people.

!@#$%! 04.11.2025 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
oh man i heard once the edgar allan poe "musical narrative" by lou read-- was it the raven i can't remember-- and it was awful in spite of the star-studded cast (i think steve buscemi read one part).

here i don't predict anything good but metallica sounds good in the background-- at least until the singer opens his mouth.

metal bands should give up vocals completely, like pelican.

oh here you are you fucking idiot

your prediction was wrong, hahahahahaa. most of it anyway

fucking idiot lolol "predicting". i hope you know better now

--

but yeah it's great that hetfield mostly shuts the fuck up here. whenever he sings he spoils things for me

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genteel Death
This album brings back talking about characters, and Lou Reed is good at writing about characters. Imagine, in a world where almost everyone is so busy with talking about themselves, what it's like to observe and write about other people.


13 years later, even more so

The Soup Nazi 04.12.2025 03:24 AM

The one Lou Reed album I don't have. And I have Lou stuff that even Laurie Anderson doesn't have. ;)

Metal is stupid.

!@#$%! 04.13.2025 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
The one Lou Reed album I don't have. And I have Lou stuff that even Laurie Anderson doesn't have. ;)


what, like... a jar full of young lou's pubes?

creepy...

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi
Metal is stupid.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LGX8TbvGew

The Soup Nazi 04.14.2025 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
what, like... a jar full of young lou's pubes?

creepy...


The real question is why did your mind go there. Now that is creepy...


Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!


Jeff Bridges should have won an Oscar for that role, but the Academy doesn't give best actor/actress in a leading role Oscars for comedy, because the Academy is stupid. Like metal.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content Đ2006 Sonic Youth