do you only do wood flooring i'm looking at new tile for my kitchen

Condoms? No one uses those anymore...

next time, when yr tiling, you should be naughty and do it with a condom on.

I would, if I tiled. It's because I value my cock.

Never on the first date?

condom or no?

^ no

Does she go to Church? If yes than no ;)


I used touse Durex. Its the only condom worth putting on your dick. However, I've since became rather Orthodox in my living, and its all or nothing. What is the fun of sex without the risk of pregnancy? To be sure, I don't have promiscuous sex in the first place, the women I am with are worth an infection or impregnation if the need be.

Condoms are cool, if you lack the self control and penis discipline, but InI Rastafari come from the Shaolin Temple..

"You lie down with dogs you end up with disease" - Fear of a Black hat

Suchfriends is right. Besides, almost every other STI is easy to catch even if you wear a condom.

a) i dont understand how people think only about the danger of pregnancy.
and there is no fun, especially for the woman, to live with that stress.
b) promiscuous has a negative meaning no?
c) noone is worth an infection.
i wont enter the talk about casual sex; but lets say, you have met someone, who you really like (wont say that s/he is the partner of your life, because you cant know that for sure and prehand) and you 'wait' to have sex. what if the sex sucks? dont you want to know that in time?

i m not attacking you, we just dont agree.

im trying to figure out what exactly you had in mind using this gif along with asking that question. can you help me?


the image is marvelous btw.

One can only hope that the partners of the condom-less men in this thread share their cavalier attitudes towards unprotected sex; primarily, so that they both know full-well what is being broughf upon them, but secondly (and more important to me) so that nautural selection may strengthen the herd, by imparting the cold-carress of a retrovirus into their bodies, insuring that neither survive to breed again.

DIE, earthmen; DIE.

Nef - I do not know.

I think that if you are going to be involved sexually with more than one person you need to protect yourself, and protect others from you. YOu do not know waht fucked up shit you have. People have hepatitis for decades without knowing, passing it on to others.

even fuckers in the porn industry, who get mandatory STD testing regularly, still catch diseases.

if u wanna do a stranger, it is still true, you are not only doing them, but you are doing everyone that person has ever fucked too.

i know you didn't mean this, but your post reminded me of a true story i know about.

this kid i once met (friend of friends) fell in love with another boy who had AIDS. and the kid himself being involved in the health care field (won't say where or how, won't name names) wanted to be an AIDS activist and organize for a cure or something but anyway in solidarity with his boyfriend he gets himself infected-- blam! knowingly and all. what's mine is yours, what's yours is mine. is that like, tragic, romantic love or what? yes, yes it is. "till death do us part" or "let's die together." one could write a tragic melodrama and make a corny movie about that shit.





























except that -- they broke up later. :/

fuck that dumb shit!

yeah, no shit. when we heard about it i was like "i knew he was fucked up but not that insane." poor bastard.

We don't have to agree in the slightest, but understand the biological reality of sex is that it is always a matter of pregnancy or infection, and there is no form of protection or birth-control which is 100%. So whenever we as humans choose to have sex, we are taking that risk. It should always then be worth it, because that risk is always there. I am not saying that there is necessarily one special person above any other person who is morally worth it, but the reality is there are infections to be had, and it might as well seem worth it no? Further, pregnancy is sort of the Evolutionary function let alone existential function of sex, and so it too is always part of the equation, and so partners should always more or less be compatible enough for such a long haul no? That is my point, it is based on the biological ontology of sex, not any particular moral outlook. I may be a Christian, but we aren't all necessarily prudes ;)

I got no moral beef with anybody having sex particularly with anyone, however folks should always know what ups when they fuck.