Originally Posted by tesla69

People spit out 'hipster' like it was dyke or faggot except its acceptable to say. I'm tired of this self loathing. Its a way for you to dismiss 'x' by saying 'hipster'. As if they even exist! Its yet another way for the Spectacle to disparage young people. Oh, you have some interests outside the Spectacle? look at the niggers I mean hipsters and their curious habit 'x'. Meanwhile, y'all take illusionary power by ragging on them just like I used to rag on trustafarians. Look at your game.

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

I am a hipster like a motherfucker.

I hate the normal shit. I want the cutting edge shit.

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

wrong thread man, wrong thread

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

there are 2 kinds of hipsters

1) society's black sheep-- bizarre & unclassifiable people

2) the "alternative" fashionistas-- white middle class vegan kids on extended allowances living in brooklyn, such as:


















it's a formula, it's the follower following the followers

zat you, santy claus?

naaaaaaaaah!!!

you're type 1 hence labels do not apply

Originally Posted by groar

for fuck sure,I'm no hipster.Just cuz TM says it's absurd,don't make it so.It's actually practical,probably even fits into some marketing demographic model,otherwise Starbucks wouldn't be involved. I consider Kim's comment that Starbucks is less evol than Universal,bitching-no one made SY do business with that label.Plus like I said,the Starbucks deal is associated with Universal,unless I misread it. I wouldn't put my recordings in Starbucks.Starbucks wouldn't put my recordings in Starbucks.It's about money for SY ,not altruism.

Originally Posted by sonicl

I wasn't aware that they were bitching. It seems to be a bunch of indie hipsters that are doing all the bitching.

You ask any of the recording musicians on here if they'd like the chance to have tons more people exposed to their music, you can bet they'd say hell yeah.