Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   British people of SYG: please DO NOT vote for Cameron. (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=39713)

knox 05.07.2010 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pookie
"You".

Are you fleeing? Have you fled?


I could never be one of you.

nicfit 05.07.2010 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SYRFox
I invite you all to France. We got a better government






















oh wait... no.



I invite you all to....
nevermind...

Keeping It Simple 05.07.2010 06:52 AM

They voted for Cameron. Leave the country if you must.

Glice 05.07.2010 07:04 AM

That is my actual plan, although I'll point out to you that Cameron does not have a majority.

Toilet & Bowels 05.07.2010 08:05 AM

leaving the country is for pussies, i'm going to form a terrorist cell

Lurker 05.07.2010 08:16 AM

My non Tory MP got in thankfully.

Looks like it's going to be a hung parliament with Tory and Lib Dems. If things go with the economy as people are predicting, the Tories will lose their popularity.

Pookie 05.07.2010 08:24 AM

The trouble with a Tory/LibDem coalition is that we'll get a watered down Cameron and people won't get to see him in all his full-blown cuntosity.

Pookie 05.07.2010 08:25 AM

Incidentally my Tory MP got in again - she got 50% of the vote. I figure I just need to punch every other person when I go out.

Lurker 05.07.2010 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pookie
Incidentally my Tory MP got in again - she got 50% of the vote. I figure I just need to punch every other person when I go out.



Good idea, or alternatively punch the other 50% whilst wearing a blue rosette to change peoples mind.

Glice 05.07.2010 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker
Good idea, or alternatively punch the other 50% whilst wearing a blue rosette to change peoples mind.


The only problem with that is that you'd have to be careful with ethnic minorities - on the one hand, punching them would definitely dissuade that person from voting Tory; on the other, most Tories would probably quite like it if you gave 'some of that' to 'one of them'.

Lurker 05.07.2010 08:36 AM

Good point. You'd essentially be campaigning for them.

Pookie 05.07.2010 08:44 AM

Anybody else have council elections as well?

My LibDem councillor got re-elected. I would have voted against him for the sole reason that he was responsible for an outdoor gym being installed in my local park.
And here he is demonstrating how to look like a twat:


 

Pookie 05.07.2010 08:46 AM

^^^I feel a bit guilty for that because his daughter is at school with my daughter and he's a nice man.

But...an outdoor gym!????

Lurker 05.07.2010 08:48 AM

Does anybody even use those outdoor gyms? I've only ever seen them in rough areas too, where it's more likely yobbish youths will be hanging around.

Pookie 05.07.2010 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker
Does anybody even use those outdoor gyms?

No.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker
I've only ever them in rough areas too, where it's more likely yobbish youths hanging around.

It's in a rough-ish area and was vandalised within a week.

Lurker 05.07.2010 08:51 AM

Haha, how predictable.

demonrail666 05.07.2010 08:56 AM

why can't they just have a penalty shootout?

SonicBebs 05.09.2010 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker
I've only ever seen them in rough areas too, where it's more likely yobbish youths will be hanging around.


tory!!!


and no one ever had any good arguments for my comments other than ones along the lines of "the conservatives are just as bad" which was pretty much my point

i suppose it's easier to hide behind a simple get out clause (the conspiracy accusation) and call me names...

Lurker 05.09.2010 08:33 AM

What the hell are you talking about?

demonrail666 05.09.2010 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicBebs
and no, you can't predict a recesion (and it possibly would have been far worse with a Conservative government) but the government is in control of the country and the economy and is ultimatley responsible. To vote them back in and say "hey, you fucked up and fucked us up but dont worry, have another go at spending my tax money on bankers bonuses" is daft

and once again (to make it stick) i am not voting torrie


You're saying on one hand that the government can't predict a recession, then you're saying that they should ultimately be held responsible. No country involved in the recession came out of it very well and under Brown Britain did a lot better than most others. Would I say Darling would've done a better job than Vince Cable? Possibly. Would i say he'd have done a better job than George Osborne? Absolutely.

In relation to the latter point, I'm sorry to use a football analogy here but if Rafa Benitez isn't getting things done, that's reason enough to get rid of him, but not if it means replacing him with Phil Brown. And as far as I'm concerned, that's exactly what the country has voted for.

floatingslowly 05.09.2010 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toilet & Bowels
leaving the country is for pussies, i'm going to form a terrorist cell


that's sooo 1983. :rolleyes:

cells have a weak link.

become a cell of ONE.

floatingslowly 05.09.2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
You're saying on one hand that the government can't predict a recession, then you're saying that they should ultimately be held responsible. No country involved in the recession came out of it very well and under Brown Britain did a lot better than most others. Would I say Darling would've done a better job than Vince Cable? Possibly. Would i say he'd have done a better job than George Osborne? Absolutely.

In relation to the latter point, I'm sorry to use a football analogy here but if Rafa Benitez isn't getting things done, that's reason enough to get rid of him, but not if it means replacing him with Phil Brown. And as far as I'm concerned, that's exactly what the country has voted for.


^^^ reposted for page propagation.

Lurker 05.09.2010 11:15 AM

What happened to space? you are the same person right?

Lurker 05.09.2010 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
You're saying on one hand that the government can't predict a recession, then you're saying that they should ultimately be held responsible. No country involved in the recession came out of it very well and under Brown Britain did a lot better than most others. Would I say Darling would've done a better job than Vince Cable? Possibly. Would i say he'd have done a better job than George Osborne? Absolutely.

In relation to the latter point, I'm sorry to use a football analogy here but if Rafa Benitez isn't getting things done, that's reason enough to get rid of him, but not if it means replacing him with Phil Brown. And as far as I'm concerned, that's exactly what the country has voted for.



Yes

SonicBebs 05.09.2010 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonrail666
In relation to the latter point, I'm sorry to use a football analogy here but if Rafa Benitez isn't getting things done, that's reason enough to get rid of him, but not if it means replacing him with Phil Brown. And as far as I'm concerned, that's exactly what the country has voted for.


fair enough, but if Rafa had got them relegated there's no way he could stay. We're looking pretty championship material as a nation right now...

on the plus side, big fucking happy for brighton and big fucking happy for Barking too

ni'k 05.09.2010 01:26 PM

as i've already said the recession was predicted by MANY people, dave harvey, michael ruppert, ALL THOSE PEOPLE THAT GOTTEN BEATEN BY THE COPS PROTESTIN IN NEW YORK ABOUT IT IN 04. loads of people. they all knew it was coming. it's like, ya know, an inevitable part of capitalism.

and erm, no the government isn't in control of the economy, i'd say it's the other way round. just to be so crazy.

demonrail666 05.09.2010 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonicBebs
We're looking pretty championship material as a nation right now...


So are most countries at the moment. It's hardly like the UK is slipping down the table while it's just business as usual for all the others.

As I said, I fully understand people wanting to get rid of Labour, but when I look at who's replacing them I only see things going backwards. This recession is going to give the tories a green light to implement all the draconian measures they'd never get away with implementing. Things like the minimum wage will almost certainly be reviewed as more people struggle to find employment, while anything not earmarked as 'essential' will have its funding cut to shreds. England will be ok if you're already wealthy or willing to work for peanuts just to survive, but anyone who wants more than that is gonna be royally fucked.

I know you've said you didn't vote Tory, so this isn't aimed at you, but anyone who did should be immediately sent to the tower for treason.

SonicBebs 05.09.2010 02:31 PM

at least with a tory/libdem gov we might get the system changed? I'm pretty sure libdems wont go to bed with anyone without getting their reform put through (and wont they get to veto any of the torries fucked up policies?)

i guess ni'k is right too. i don't know alot about economics but i understand the theory of boom and bust. Surely Gordon Brown does too? He should have stepped in long ago when the bankers started losing their 'confidence'

ni'k 05.09.2010 02:49 PM

no. we wont get the system changed with that pact. not at-fucking-all. and the libdems only have 57 seats as opposed to the cons 306, they won't get a fuckin' look in. it would be a weakass pact and it wouldn't last. the only good thing about it would be that people would realise that ALL the major parties are absolutely useless.

people have this illusion that the lib dems are somehow a leftist party. nope. they brag about being more thatcherite economically than cameron. they are free marketers, like all the major polticians. which is a position about as valid in reality as an the facist dreams of an alzhiemeric kis in a retirment home. they are centre right. you'd get some slivers of soft left social stuff with them, like they're slightly cooler than labour on gay issues. they aren't overt racists like the tories- you get the kind of soft left position im talking about here. but you won't get anything really substantial from them. they are pro afghanistan war ffs! not going to be on the side of the workers in any strike situation either.


the answer to all these questions is called greece and i heartily endorse you keep your eyes on whats happening over there.

i have these beautiful dreams of the daily mail office burning to the ground...

demonrail666 05.09.2010 02:53 PM

a tory lib/dem pact will almost certainly lead to another election in a year or two, which the conservatives are likely to win with a proper majority, increasing their power - and the length of their reign. Personally, I'd rather the Lib Dems tell Cameron to fuck off so they're forced to operate as a minority government (allowing the opposition to unofficially unite, which would put them in a far stronger position to veto the Tory's than I suspect any kind of Tory-Lib Dem pact would).

ni'k 05.09.2010 02:57 PM

really? ha man i'll have to respectfully disagree with that. the pact will of course lead to an election soon but the tories will LOOSE! whoever forms the government will loose! spending cuts my man, spending cuts.

the spending cuts are gonna be the harshest ever.

capitalism has to punish US, the poor, we have to pay for the bankers mistakes and corruption. that's just simply the way it works. and we won't be too happy. remember the poll tax riots, that was over nothing compared to whats coming.

if we form a new social movement out of the wreckage of a dying capitalism the playing field is ours.

davenotdead 05.09.2010 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genteel Death
No, The tories are Tori Amos'party.



that explains why this thread is so popular then, thanks

Lurker 05.09.2010 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ni'k
really? ha man i'll have to respectfully disagree with that. the pact will of course lead to an election soon but the tories will LOOSE! whoever forms the government will loose! spending cuts my man, spending cuts.

the spending cuts are gonna be the harshest ever.

capitalism has to punish US, the poor, we have to pay for the bankers mistakes and corruption. that's just simply the way it works. and we won't be too happy. remember the poll tax riots, that was over nothing compared to whats coming.

if we form a new social movement out of the wreckage of a dying capitalism the playing field is ours.



Ah finally!! A chance to create the fascist state that I dream of!

ni'k 05.09.2010 04:04 PM

Ah finally! A chance to kill you when you try!

Lurker 05.09.2010 04:22 PM

See this is exactly what puts me off communism. Fascists are so much friendlier.

ni'k 05.09.2010 04:28 PM

pololitcal humour lol

Toilet & Bowels 05.09.2010 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ni'k
really? ha man i'll have to respectfully disagree with that. the pact will of course lead to an election soon but the tories will LOOSE! whoever forms the government will loose! spending cuts my man, spending cuts.


i'd be very surprised if there was another election and the tories lost, there were massive spending cuts in the 80s and the tories were still in power until 1997. unless there's some kind of massive & unforseeable change in british politics in at least the next 8 years we're going to be faced with a tory majority for as long as it takes everyone to forget about the last few years of labour, this recession, and for however long it takes the labour party to regroup and present itself as fresh again.

ni'k 05.09.2010 04:44 PM

i wouldn't be. the cuts will be way way bigger than the 80's, look into it. the massive change in politics will arise from the cuts.

seriously what you said is so horribly depressing i'm not even going to contemplate it.

Toilet & Bowels 05.09.2010 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ni'k
seriously what you said is so horribly depressing i'm not even going to contemplate it.


well, that's real life for you

Toilet & Bowels 05.09.2010 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ni'k
i wouldn't be. the cuts will be way way bigger than the 80's, look into it. the massive change in politics will arise from the cuts.



also, everyone knows the cuts are coming and is expecting whoever is in power to make them, so i doubt it will make the government unpopular for doing what is deemed neccessary. if anything it will make them look like they're doing a good job.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth