Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   The Homo Thread of the Week (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=6144)

k-krack 09.17.2006 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600
yeah, gays deserve the same right to get married & start to hate each other that straight people have!

I forget which comedian I saw that told this joke.


chris rock said it, and so did jeff foxworthy. they are both equally not funny though. relationship jokes are not ever funny. which is why women comedians are almost never funny.

atari 2600 09.17.2006 04:43 PM

"relationship comedian"


most of this guy's bits are funny


Corey Holcomb
 

Glice 09.17.2006 04:52 PM

I agree with wishy-washy liberal cop-out statements nos #47772, #3291 and #98.

krastian 09.18.2006 12:06 AM

Degenerates.

sonicl 09.18.2006 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hip Priest
Of course a committed gay relationship should be accorded the same respect and rights as a married couple, if that's the question, but then so should any two people living together who sign a bit of scribbled paper saying 'we're committed'. I think marriage has a strict definition, ie The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife with the blessing of church and/or state. I don't think that two gay men or women can fulfil those criteria, I don't think we should change the definition of 'marriage' to fit, and to be frank I don't see why people are so bothered about marriage - what actually matters is a commitment to a life-long loving relationship, and in that context it doesn't matter to me if two people are straight or gay, sexual or platonic, male or female or mixed or whatever.

The issue should be that authority should respect the fact that two people have a shared commitment to each other. 'Marriage' is just a way of government and church enforcing their rules upon your relationship, so f*** marriage.

One of the best posts EVER on this board.

britt-stinker 09.18.2006 02:44 PM

I'm bisexual. Atleast.

HaydenAsche 09.18.2006 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by britt-stinker
I'm bisexual. Atleast.


At least?

cryptowonderdruginvogue 09.18.2006 02:55 PM

i dont really care...
so i went ahead and went with "no" for obvious reasons

Savage Clone 09.18.2006 03:14 PM

If you don't really care, why place restrictions? Why not just vote yes?

Hip Priest's point brings up the whole "separate but equal" quagmire.

I say legal civil unions for all, and let the religious people have their non-legally-binding marriage ceremonies. This is how it should have been all along anyway.

cryptowonderdruginvogue 09.18.2006 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone
If you don't really care, why place restrictions? Why not just vote yes?


to piss people off, hehehe

and because i can do that

porkmarras 09.18.2006 03:16 PM

Crypto,what was school like today?

Savage Clone 09.18.2006 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cryptowonderdruginvogue
to piss people off, hehehe



Ah, yes. The "obvious reasons" you spoke of.

static-harmony 09.18.2006 03:19 PM

I like republicans, they are a fun group to be with.

cryptowonderdruginvogue 09.18.2006 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porkmarras
Crypto,what was school like today?

it was good
i have another class in an hour

cryptowonderdruginvogue 09.18.2006 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone
Ah, yes. The "obvious reasons" you spoke of.


look down
|
|
|
v

porkmarras 09.18.2006 03:27 PM

Good.

screamingskull 09.18.2006 03:35 PM

YES

pokkeherrie 09.18.2006 03:49 PM

homo thread of the week? that's so gay!

i don't really care either. i guess savage clone's solution would be the best really; civil unions for all... although to many people that doesn't sound as romantic as getting married i suppose.

anyway, if gays really feel the need to engage in the old blessing of church and state then i don't see why they shouldn't be allowed to like everybody else who feels the need to... which means they'd have to have the right by law to get "married" rather than just getting a civil-union that's equal. laws should be equal for everyone after all. to get a church blessing for a gay marriage is a bit more complicated i suppose, but that's freedom of religion.

GeneticKiss 09.19.2006 12:23 AM

Funny how religious people say homosexuality is not "part of God's plan", then turn around and say presuming to know the will of God is a sin.

atari 2600 09.19.2006 12:31 AM

...and the simple fact that Nature, if anything, surely is "God's plan" and nature tells us that all species that can be homosexual have homosexuals among their numbers.

Your post made me think of Bush and his supposed prayer that was answered by God that he should invade Iraq.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth