What's the worst...
 

Proposition in your state?

As you know elections are coming next week, and was wondering what is the worst proposition you are voting against.

i'm voting against "women working the bog".... in ireland recently women who work in bogs get beaten badley by dogs and sticks... its terrible, let the Women work the bogs i say.

I am voting against proposition 85. It makes it illegal for under-age girls to get abortions. I am voting against it, because not all girls have families where the parents won't beat them, or throw them out if they found out she was pregnant.

here in Idaho, there is Proposition 1, which is a financial boost to the schools; i will be voting for that. Proposition 2 is a property tax relief to businesses, but the conservative backers of the bill never really mentioned that it doesn't help homeowners (many are under the assumption that it will help them); i will be voting against it.

this is the first time i've ever voted. i'm so excited. especially because the Democrats here actually have a chance of winning for once!

im hoping that all of you in states with propositions to ban gay marriage will vote against banning it .
its up to everyone to choose for themselves whether they want to ruin their life/relationship or not .

There is a "Prop H", and I always laugh because I think they are saying preparation H. I never found out what it was about.

It is about building affordable housing and L.A. will get 1,000,000,000 for it.

prop. 3 tobacco tax

Fucking right. Tobacco tax SUCKS.

prop my balls.


scrotum tax

I for one am for any of these, but opposed to banning them in public.

elections coming up in holland as well this month!
i'm not sure yet who to vote on, but at least the options have been somewhat reduced now that the paedophiles won't be participating... :rolleyes:


Dutch paedophile party lacks support
October 5, 2006 - 6:39AM

A political party formed by Dutch paedophiles is unlikely to gather sufficient support to run in general elections next month.
The Brotherly Love, Freedom and Diversity party (PNVD) probably will not succeed in gathering the 570 signatures from supporters needed by October 10 to run in the national elections, the party's secretary Norbert de Jonge said.
The party was launched in May and its campaign for a cut in the age of consent from 16 to 12, and the legalisation of child pornography and sex with animals has provoked widespread outrage within and outside the Netherlands.
The party managed to attract more than 100 sympathisers on its website, although several withdrew their support.
"They are afraid that their windows will be smashed, just as happened yesterday to our chairman," De Jonge said.
The PNVD says it wants to lift the taboo on paedophilia which it has said has intensified since the 1996 Marc Dutroux child abuse scandal in neighbouring Belgium.
In July, a Dutch court rejected a bid by a children's rights group to have the party banned, saying it was protected by democratic freedoms and judges could not take lightly a decision to ban a political party.
© 2006 Reuters, Click for Restrictions

man, and i thought Idaho was weird.

well i guess we do have a reputation to live up to when it comes to tolerating all kinds of sex... it's encouraging they couldn't even collect 570 signatures though.

do you care to explain why?

He wants you to maintain your ability to ruin my otherwise good time at a rock show, but he wants you to have to pay through the nose to do it.

i promise to spit in your eye if i ever meet you.

That is a heavily-taxed activity now.

it's okay. i can afford it, because i have a job, unlike some people i know.

Your taunts are useless; I have worked for two decades and I am thoroughly enjoying not working for a little while.

because these taxes will pay for other services, and it can also reduced the people of smoking it, because they will eventually won't be able to afford.