Nigella's 70 year old hubby is quick with the choke
 

That Saatchi sure likes to throw a choke down. Nigella claims it was all playful and foolin around.
damn

"About a week ago, we were sitting outside a restaurant having an intense debate about the children, and I held Nigella's neck repeatedly while attempting to emphasize my point," Saatchi, an art dealer and former advertising mogul, told The Evening Standard.
"There was no grip, it was a playful tiff. The pictures are horrific but give a far more drastic and violent impression of what took place. Nigella's tears were because we both hate arguing, not because she had been hurt," he added. "We had made up by the time we were home. The paparazzi were congregated outside our house after the story broke yesterday morning, so I told Nigella to take the kids off till the dust settled."




My question is this, have any of you ever grabbed your wife/husband/friend/boyfriend/lover's neck while arguing about domestic stuff? I have not. I have wanted to, but to reach out a choke is threatening no?



That shit is fucked.


Nigella has moved out with the children according to the UK tabloids.


Ladies and gentlemen, if your partner chokes you during routine family tiffs, get the fuck out.

Saatchi has also been mentioned by many victims as one of a large ring of pedophiles/sex fiends who work in the UK.

Where did you hear that?

My view of Nigella is this, you don't marry a guy like Saatchi (i.e. ruling class sociopath) without knowing what you're getting into. And the reason you marry someone like him is for what you can get out of it. She probably turns a blind eye to him being an alleged sex offender.

Saatch went to the police yesterday on advice from his lawyer and accepted a "police citation" which in England means that he admitted to choking her/assaulting her, and the admittance closes the book on it.


As far as his being involved in satanic sex rituals, http://www.whale.to/c/sexcult1.html

Maybe Nigella wants to be a sister-wife in the Instigator house of the Church of Latter Day Marios? She could cook me and my wife dinner, and then we could cook it up in the bedroom, and I would never choke her unless she asked for it... ;)

To be fair, she's not the best person to take to a restaurant. He was probably just trying to shut her up about the salad dressing not being quite right.

He cannot take her food-porn.

I was in love with a girl who looked very similar to this back about 20 years ago....

torture indeed.

someday a real rain will come and wash the streets....

purge the district, scrub it hard, time to clean up our own backyard

she's fucking gorgeous-- why did she have to marry that creepy geezer? for his millions? damn. people are weird.

maybe he tried to strangle her when she told him "i'll fuck the waiter and have him poison you and we'll fritter away your money"

maybe she made fun of his viagra habit

maybe he caught her looking at some fresh meat and felt inferior

maybe he was horsewhipped in boarding school

maybe he peed the bed until he was 27 and he just started again

She should just hold on for a few more years and then rake in millions when he kicks it.

I'd take a throat hold for that. Better than working at mcdonalds.

What about working at McDowells?

The other thing about Nigella Lawson is that her Dad was a prominent Tory under Thatcher, who looks a bit like her current husband. So even though she's hot she's probably a creep.

Maybe RobInstiagor could 'save' her. We could do a kickstarter campaign so that he could meet her 1 million pound per month wife allowance.

They're both creepy and not in an interesting way.

Hahahaa.. that's some cold shit ain't it though..

you're probably immune to her charms but i'm not




she does... things... to me.

(her image, anyway)

speaking of public/private personas, here's a fun (and lame) attempt at psychoanalysis from the british press:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...gic-abuse.html

cold fish! (i'm shocked)

Don't choke your women.

but what if they *cough cough* like it?

remember, sex choking kills.

Michael Hutchence
David Carradine

if you cannot choke your chicken without chocking yourself, then you need to take a break! Let your vital fluids replenish!

see, this is wrong. it assumes that all choking sex is of the masturbatory kind, in solitary shame and with ropes.

misguided.

i'm just saying.

I did say "choke your chicken"

if you got a kinky woman whose dad used to beat her and she likes that you choke her while she is receiving sexual pleasure from you, go right ahead, but know you are doing it as a result of her trauma.

nah, nah, you're missing the mark. i'm not talking about reenacting abuse a la annabel chong's gang rape, i'm talking about helping a friend gloriously make it into cumland by applying gentle pressure to the here and there, not by threatening their lives. more vulcan, less pulp fiction.

ah, americans!

;)
ha!

Just a personal thing,. my violence nexus in my brain is not connected to my sexual nexus in any way, thank goodness.

neither is mine. i don't understand rapists because another person screaming for their life is the LAST thing that's going to make my dick hard.

HORRIBLE.

I used to go out with a girl who was a fairly hardcore feminist and I'm pretty sure she wasn't abused by her dad or anybody else, but she used to like to be choked, slapped around, spat on and degraded, and tbh it took me a while to get used to it and kind of messed me up for a bit afterwards.

Our sexual nature comes from somewhere....

we are not born wanting to be humiliated are we?

heavy questions on SYGossip

!@#$%!

i agree, she is off the charts. And not exactly young either.

Nigella's first husband was 30+ years older than her, and Saatch is about 20 years older than her. Oh to be a rich septuagenarian, so I could sweep her off her Anglican feet....

I can't imagine ever being able to have a relationship with someone 20 or 30 years my junior.

sex=power

It is power over another person, and it is power over yourself. You have power when you abstain or restrain your sexuality, even if temporarily (i.e. why people can't just start fucking or jacking off on the bus or at the water cooler at work). There is a time and place. Further, there is varying etiquette, but more or less all sex is power. We give people power over us to be pleasured, and in the same instance we have power over them while we pleasure them. For example, oral sex seems to some to be "degrading" and yet to others, to be the giver is to have that power over a person, while at the same time the person receiving probably equally feels a bit of power.




Violence is a form of asserting power. Some people are always on a power trip, so they are either violent or sometimes just promiscuous, but either way, they are even if subconsciously searching for opportunities to express and assert power.

Me? I'm a spiritualist, sex is about a higher power. It is about a higher connection. If its not? You're just kidding yourself and its just masturbation with a partner ;)

It's possible. I'm not fond of answers that lead to nature/nurture speculation, I used to be more of the opinion that our personalities are formed more through experience, but these days I'm starting to think more that personality is as much in our genes as hair colour or anything else.

Genes are just a chemical pattern. They are only half the story. Humans are living beings. Genes ARE NOT alive. Whatever force animates and gives life, is that which shapes the personality. The person is an entity which exists separate from the genes, rather, which experiences the genes, chemicals, and physicality of the body. Further, even without a body or without sexual chemicals, people desire sex. So nature AND nurture and thrown right out the equation, and again, we have to seek something deeper, transcendental, and yes, spiritual.

Atheism still has a place for the spiritual, for the transcendental, because there are aspects of the human experience which can not be explained simply by biochemistry, no matter how eloquently theorized or explained.

im confused because, although i understand and agree with almost everything you say here, i could never really view sex as power over someone else. even though i have been hearing that so many years and even having it making sense for a second.
maybe it takes place temporary and subconsciously, especially during the act.
maybe i can understand when people who are attracted and want eachother and want to devour eachother, by having sex they feel some kind of power, because they managed to have a taste of the other one.
sex is to me, about pleasure, enjoying your and other body, about connection as you said too, and about feeling alive. and that is surely powerful feelings and it does make you feel power(-ful).
ok, i can get the power over the other thing, but i dont believe its a thought or feeling that can last for long in someone's head.
well, i havent been in a relationship for a very long time and perhaps i am forgetting things.
sex and all the rest of a couple life, although essentially connected, they can be separate things. for example, we all know, there is sex talk and it has its place only during sex. but surely there are thin lines and limits, that perhaps we dont know we have, and not only regarding sex, that if crossed it may affect us as people and therefor affect the relationship as well.

vex. when i opened the thread i was wtf are those people.
i know about the gallery, but i had to google for them.

its weird, in one picture she is so static, like she is faking it. perhaps its the shot. however, in another, his fist one the table, says it all.




me neither. too boring, and for the time being extremely unsexual to me.
unless he was a genious and i am 70. but then it would be too yikes. NO.

i have told you about my friend; she isnt into guys, she has many married friends though and she strongly believes that women should be with younger men, in order to have a balanced energy about life. and sex.



isnt it weird that as we grow older, we start to think this way?
i started thinking like that regarding gender, but i need to explore and think more about this. i m not entirely sure whats true.


oh i think it fits here. under the genes thing.
i d like to state how pissed i got, when people shared an article in a paper, that is mainly for youth whats happening in the city and shit paper. and because of the type of paper, it was even more disturbing to see an article like that featured there.
some guy was saying that Love (LOVE!!!), derives from prehistorical blablabla and genes carryin the need of people to reproduce.
he didnt even bother to say smth about great loves between people who didnt have any children and between people of the same sex!
i ll stop here. if we like to talk about love, we can continue i guess.

nigella sux. I much prefer ainsley, that man has style.



great fkn cous cous.