Philosophy corner for the unitiated
 

There you go.Wank your brains to death.

Wanking is merely the manifestation of inert jouissances, ergo, the re-sublimation of a joiu-atrixGod a la Fleschig revisting Ithica. I'm much more into computer games.

3 or more syllable words confuse me...

Socrates of Menwn Meno ) exertus delibero utrum necne rectum can exsisto doctus , quod is rectus plumbum ut a curiosus quesitio of vis of rectum ipsum. Tametsi suus directus refero est ut rectum est unteachable Socrates does propono doctrina of recordatio interpretor quare nos verumtamen es in possessio of significant scientia super talis res. Plurimus ingens Socrates oro hic ut scientia quod rectum es sic propinquus ut haud humanus procurator umquam gnarus does malum : nos totus invariably operor quis nos puto futurus optimus. Amplio se gero , tunc can tantum exsisto a uber nostri ignarus quinymo quam a symptom of infirmitas of mos Gk. akrasia akrásia ]}. Idem eadem idem visum est quoque tutor in PrwtagoraV Protagoras ), per per fides ut totus of vitualis must exsisto cultum una.


Αποτελέσματα αναζήτησης για Δεν βρέθηκαν λέξεις.

in other words
Socrates tried to determine whether or not virtue can be taught, and this naturally leads to a careful investigation of the nature of virtue itself. Although his direct answer is that virtue is unteachable, Socrates does propose the doctrine of recollection to explain why we nevertheless are in possession of significant knowledge about such matters. Most remarkably, Socrates argues here that knowledge and virtue are so closely related that no human agent ever knowingly does evil: we all invariably do what we believe to be best. Improper conduct, then, can only be a product of our ignorance. The same view is also defended in the Protagoras, along with the belief that all of the virtues must be cultivated together.