[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by knox

What I do admit is being drunk and making use of my usual bitchy self when I complained about it - which still doesn't justify the response. But I don't think the response would have been different if I had been all nice and fragile in my complaint.

so other people have to put up with your alcoholic bitchy self but you can't put up with other things that displease you because you represent women.

high-class troll.

you don't even consider the notion that your outrage might have looked insane and you claim that in no case you had to be "nice and fragile"-- straw person argument.

there's such a thing as being clear and direct and assertive without acting like a deranged drunk and not even apologizing for it. especially with people you claim to "respect".

if you had asked decently "hey, could you please take down those [stinking rotten teeth] [pictures of a gorgeous woman] [tumors]? they are disturbing", you could have gotten a different answer, like "sure ok sorry". but if you try to push people as if they are misbehaving 10 year olds, you're going to get pushed back.

see, if this was real life, i would have smelled the stench on your breath and seen your red eyes and noticed your slurry speech and i would have responded to you the way one responds to drunk people-- you humor them and don't take them seriously. but instead not only did i take your words seriously, but you also keep taking them seriously.

now we have you rationalizing your behavior on grounds of gender equality, and starting posts to ask if the internet is "real".

the issue is not whether we should post certain pictures or not-- the issue is that you went on an irrational drunken rant with me and expected what-- submission? hilarious. if you want to be treated politely, you should treat others the same way.

the internet is sure real. it's real enough for you to get drunk in front of it every night and expect that people tiptoe around you.

high-class troll.