Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GeneticKiss
Funny you should say this, because safety is defined as freedom from danger or hazards. So in essence you're saying total freedom will win over freedom from danger.
Do you see that as a good thing?
|
It's kind of pointless to ask,
you'll see. I'll just make it short for you:
"My freedom is more important than your freedom"
"Freedom for the poor is their freedom to pay the consequences for being poor"
"Your freedom to live is not more important than my freedom to have something I don't need"
The last can be applied to the whole scheme of consumerim too.
Conclusion:
freedom is for some.