Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nefeli
c) noone is worth an infection.
i wont enter the talk about casual sex; but lets say, you have met someone, who you really like (wont say that s/he is the partner of your life, because you cant know that for sure and prehand) and you 'wait' to have sex. what if the sex sucks? dont you want to know that in time?
i m not attacking you, we just dont agree.
|
We don't have to agree in the slightest, but understand the biological reality of sex is that it is always a matter of pregnancy or infection, and there is no form of protection or birth-control which is 100%. So whenever we as humans choose to have sex, we are taking that risk. It should always then be worth it, because that risk is always there. I am not saying that there is necessarily one special person above any other person who is morally worth it, but the reality is there are infections to be had, and it might as well seem worth it no? Further, pregnancy is sort of the Evolutionary function let alone existential function of sex, and so it too is always part of the equation, and so partners should always more or less be compatible enough for such a long haul no? That is my point, it is based on the biological ontology of sex, not any particular moral outlook. I may be a Christian, but we aren't all necessarily prudes
I got no moral beef with anybody having sex particularly with anyone, however folks should always know what ups when they fuck.
