View Single Post
Old 08.02.2013, 01:12 PM   #23
SuchFriendsAreDangerous
invito al cielo
 
SuchFriendsAreDangerous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
SuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's assesSuchFriendsAreDangerous kicks all y'all's asses
Sleazeballs like Assange hardly fall into that category.

Look. I may have been harsh on Manning, and for that I apologize. My criticism more fairly rests on Assange and WikiLeaks for the terrible way in which they handled this whole mess. Manning was probably just naive, upset, and hapless. He should have leaked the information somewhere else, but damn it, Millenials trust the interweb like it was Gospel, so its no surprise he went with WikiLeaks. It seems in hind-sight that was a major mistake. When the Pentagon Papers were leaked, major newspapers used all their legal clout to protect the sources, and it had to go all the way to the Supreme Court. Assange and WikiLeaks offered no such sanctuary or safe harbor for Manning, or Snowden for that matter, so I think they are in the wrong here, and are guilty of exploiting these young mens' naivete..
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers
 
SuchFriendsAreDangerous is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|