[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Magic Wheel Memory

4. I presented one possible scenario that might lead an otherwise loving husband to stray.

i understand, but most people are not that delicate when it comes to reasoning, and they begin to argue your example as if it was reality.

it's a problem of rhetoric. i'm pointing out your bad rhetoric, not your logic, which distracts from what i thought was your main argument-- valid reasons for lying about infidelity.

but if you were actually really trying to raise 2 questions simultaneously--1. possible reasons for infidelity PLUS 2. the casuistics of dishonesty-- then i only found the latter argument relevant and/or interesting, because the former was just empty speculation framed poorly and not worth discussing.