Quote:
Originally Posted by Iain
I think what toilet meant is that it's a lame assumption that just because something is shot on 8/16mm that that bestows some sort of inherent artyness on it. Which I would concur with. Sure 8/16mm is more aesthetically pleasing than video on the whole, in my opinion at least, but I wouldn't claim that it automatically had more artistic merit than something shot on video.
|
That is why you didn't claim it, and I did. Your opinion is that it's not what my opinion says it is. So it's not an assumption nor is it lame. It's an opinion whether you agree or disagree with it.