View Single Post
Old 04.07.2007, 02:53 PM   #7
noumenal
expwy. to yr skull
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,855
noumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard suckanoumenal cold hard sucka
Yeah, instruments, because of the way they're tuned and standard techniques, can begin to sound cliche in the wrong hands. I agree with this. SY gets around this of course because of the alternate tunings. As do others. There are so many instruments out there, why always guitar?

I don't have any good examples really, but I must say that those guitar technique books are a huge problem--they teach a very prescribed method that locks people into certain fingerings and so on. This goes back centuries (have you ever seen those technique books from the early 17th century?). I always find it interesting when someone who has mastered a certain instrument picks up a new instrument and teaches it to themself. This yields weird but good results.

I think the problem of cliche technique and whatnot is amplified in improvised music, for obvious reasons. There's nothing worse than a bad guitarist or pianist who uses the same formulas all the time.

An aside: I have some great examples of some composers that exploited the tuning, instrument layout, or technique of a certain instrument:

1. Stravinsky-Petroushka-The scene in Petroushka's room when the white and black keys on the piano battle it out and
2. Berg-Violin Concerto - the open strings of the violin form an integral part of the 1st movement's structure
noumenal is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|