Thread: reassessing goo
View Single Post
Old 09.03.2007, 02:40 AM   #54
demonrail666
invito al cielo
 
demonrail666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
demonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's asses
For what it's worth, this quote from Thurston in the Confusion is Next book sort of confirms that the band itself weren't happy with the production on the Goo album:

'... those demos are preferable in a way, just because that's the feel that we were into and that's more us. The finished album is what it is - what are you going to do, re-record it?'

Taste is ultimately subjective, but if a band complain that the production on their record isn't what they wanted, then it's fair to say that you aren't hearing what the originally wanted you to hear.
demonrail666 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|