[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by pbradley

Those are all regional statments that have little to do with the dog and the accusation of hypocrisy. If the dog was named something else and no song playing, would that change the central message of the starving dog?

I'm entirely not arguing in the defense of the regional upper class. I'm not looking at this from a sociological perspective. Art is also to be held philosophically.


I was saying that I don't believe your claim that everyone in this relatively rich society is entirely careless about the starvation and war elsewhere in the world.

1) mang, if you separate an exhibition from it context nothing is left to discuss.

2) politics/philosohpy, how far are they really? and this exhibit was made in central america for central americans. try at least to tactfully understand before judging? avoid knee-jerk reactions.

3) oh yeah your bro-- but he was there, you see. it makes a difference. not this board. disclaimer- i recently bitched here about not being able to attend a show. oh poor me!!

ps-- the "but nobody c" you quoted was a leftover from the paragraph about the guy killed by the dogs. i decided to take it out & it slipped.