[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Lamont Cranston

the 1992 Director's Cut really shouldn't be called that: WarnerBrothers were insisting something be done for a national rerelease because of the response to the screening of the 'work print' at some film festival in L.A., but Scott was busy at the time with Thelma & Louise so all he could do was give some notes to the editor and then that was rushed through.

oh fock, then he shouldnt have called it director's cut but replicant: notes to the editor. in any case, ive seen that movie enough fucking times. he can milk someone else's pocket. for fucks sakes.