Thread: Storm brewing over Starbucks disc surprises Moore
View Single Post
Old 11.13.2007, 06:22 PM   #49
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,731
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by groar
for fuck sure,I'm no hipster.Just cuz TM says it's absurd,don't make it so.It's actually practical,probably even fits into some marketing demographic model,otherwise Starbucks wouldn't be involved. I consider Kim's comment that Starbucks is less evol than Universal,bitching-no one made SY do business with that label.Plus like I said,the Starbucks deal is associated with Universal,unless I misread it. I wouldn't put my recordings in Starbucks.Starbucks wouldn't put my recordings in Starbucks.It's about money for SY ,not altruism.

hipster. on a trust fund.
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|