View Single Post
Old 04.29.2008, 10:46 PM   #17
atsonicpark
invito al cielo
 
atsonicpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 28,843
atsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's asses
True, I think I kinda misstated what I meant. I agree -- if it's shit, it's shit, but it seems that it's easier to make this kind of shit nowadays -- notice the massive influx of bands that sound exactly the same, notice all the "noise" bands that you hear about today versus noise bands from the 80's. It's a variety of things influencing that, almost 100% the internet. My point was, hearing something similiar to this that came out 20 years ago would at least be interesting from an aesthetical viewpoint... it might have sounded original today; ahead of its time, I guess... But after years of this kind of tuneless nonsense that people a) pretend to like and/or b) feel like they HAVE TO like, there's really no way to appreciation this record on any level.

Unless, of course, you're on drugs. Then, I'm sure this album is fucking "whoooooooaaaaaaaaaaaa"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#$^ L#TLW$
__________________




 
atsonicpark is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|