Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
no way man. the main reasons we went into Iraq was that Bush wanted to get glory, greater than his father, and exert control for his oil cronies (the saudi royal family/halliburton, etc) over the Iraqui oil reserves.
|
half true. while Bush II was directly involved in the Bush I administration, and in fact much of the Bush I adminstration was a part of the Bush II 00-04 administration, there is much more to this story.
The US went to war with Iraq the first time because it was a massive military power, the only real threat to the Western plan for the Middle East [the New World Order, I wish is was not a quote but I could not even make that shit up if I wanted to, we all heard em say it]. They have returned to secure the positition and prepare to go heads up with the remaining threat to this plan [ie, Iran], and establish control of the region for Zionism [american christians are more devout zionists then ultra orthodox rabbis]. They took Afghanistan like Vietnam, for the drugs cuz that is where the CIA makes all its money [upwards of 60% of the worlds heroin in the 1940s-1970s was distributed out of the Mekong River system..
my point is, how did Iraq become so powerful in the late 1980s? The answer is the United States anti-Iranian cold war policies. So clearly there is a deeper connection to the US position in Iraq then just "Bush II wanted to memorialize Bush I"...
and for the record, Obama is clearly a part of this shit, because he is NO PEACE CANDIDATE, when he says no war in Iraq, but lets focus on our REAL enemies [ie, Iran]....