View Single Post
Old 08.10.2008, 08:30 PM   #26
acousticrock87
invito al cielo
 
acousticrock87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,515
acousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by atsonicpark
Haven't read this for years, and I gotta say

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/articl...ghosts-flowers

...whether I agree with it or not (obviously I don't), it's one of the worst reviews I've ever read. Usually when you give an album a bad rating like that, you explain why. The only thing I got is "it's too New York."
The concept of a 0.0 is obviously just a "statement" of some sort from someone who wishes he were in a position to make such a statement, since I can't even conceive of a record that actually merits 0 out of 100 decimal points.

That said, not only does he fail to defend his score, but he actually makes it sound quite a bit better than a 0.

I really hope he got fired. Even Pitchfork must see throught the snobbery of that "review". He conveyed absolutely nothing worthwhile with the review, and his opinion is in severe conflict with most people interested in this kind of music. You can't do much worse than that.
acousticrock87 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|