Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Toilet & Bowels
i don't understand why the artist would give arms and legs to the ruler but not to the rock! it's inconsistent, and illogical!
|
It seems fairly obvious.
The ruler, being as thin as it is and, we can reasonably assume, anatomically oriented such that the ulterior portion of its anatomy correlates with the topmost lengthwise portion, would never be able to remain upright without some method of support. The rock, however, is fully capable of 'standing' on its own, and needs no legs for locomotion, as it can simply roll itself to its desired destination.
The rock does not possess arms because it developed a masturbatory compulsion as a pebble and caused all sorts of embarrassing ruckuses at social gatherings. A cruel but necessary preventative measure.
Sheesh.