Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pbradley
What is love?
But really, the original Terminator movie had a lame sci-fi backdrop in order to explain a simple thriller-action plot but, in order to make a franchise, subsequent movies focused on the sci-fi plot and its cartoon-like time travel element.
Terminator comes from the future to assassinate some one while someone else (terminator or not) comes from the future to save them (preventing future war optional as well as pointless). <--- All fucking three movies.
And anyone aware of the Grandfather Paradox is left wondering why take it seriously.
(I'm sure this post will earn me some neg rep)
|
lame sci-fi backdrop? what the fuck are you rambling about? what other movie has the plot as:
A messianic hero who is born because he sends his own father back in time to save his mother from a cyborg sent back for a retroactive abortion. How can his father be from the future if the future didn't yet exist when he was conceived?
and even more psychedelic, Myles Dyson and the other skynet/military scientists ONLY invented and manufactured the AI/computer systems based upon the technology recovered from the Terminator machine crushed in the skynet factory by sarah connor, so to sum it up:
The Hero's father is from the future, and he is created from the future coming in contact with the past, having been sent by himself in the future, and apparently fully aware of this fact.
Humans are fighting against a machine which they invented from finding a piece of this machine from the future sent back into the past, so essentially the machine invented itself?