|
I suspect he's using 'reinterpretive' (incidentally, I'd've hyphenated that) to mean that you draw positive conclusions about pot upon non-coextensive evidence, viz, you're using spurious logic. I suspect !"£$^% would've been less inclined to criticise if you'd've not said 'proof' in your initial post.
And on a serious note - weed is just something that's a laugh. I apologise if this is sacrilegious*, but weed just makes you talk shit and have a laugh, there's nothing more sacred about it.
*I say this because, as a non-Rastafari, my understanding is that opinion is divided on the reliigous 'content' of weed.
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Savage Clone
Last time I was in Chicago I spent an hour in a Nazi submarine with a banjo player.
|
|