Thread: Wikipedia
View Single Post
Old 06.12.2006, 09:58 PM   #35
acousticrock87
invito al cielo
 
acousticrock87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,515
acousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's asses
It's good for certain things, but not everything. I personally think it's a horrible website to get info on bands. It's pretty good for musical eras and terms and stuff, but not bands. I use the official websites. It is addicting, though.

I don't think I've read an essay or heard a speech, which required references, at my college that didn't include it as a reference. For this reason I never cite it. Also, by definition of the word "wiki" couldn't it all potentially be wrong? Does anyone moniter it? If so, who, and can we trust them?
acousticrock87 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|