View Single Post
Old 03.21.2009, 03:34 AM   #32
This Is Not Here
invito al cielo
 
This Is Not Here's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kingston-Upon-Thames, London
Posts: 2,586
This Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's assesThis Is Not Here kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norma J

also, I don't think it's about the reproductivity of the artwork, but it's the initial pleasure (or displeasure) of the piece of art and the pleasure thereafter. and therefore this is endless. one can still get the same from a painting as they can from a photograph whether one medium is easily reproduced or not. I don't think people look at a photograph that they absolutely adore and think 'but... it CAN be printed again, s it loses its value to me'.
Yeah I agree with this. It's always fustrated me how all the photographs I've taken have never been subect to the intense scrutiny and consideration my paintings have, though the consideration that goes into them is often equal to anything i may have painted...
__________________
http://images.google.co.uk/url?sourc...zLTl_B146tcuiw




~~Record of the moment~~
This Is Not Here is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|