View Single Post
Old 05.20.2009, 12:19 AM   #17
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,731
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonikJesus
I'm not asking you guys who WAS more influential, I'm asking who you guys THINK is more influential. Just because Beatles came first and/or influenced the Ramones, it doesn't mean they are more influential. swa(y)'s previous post does a good job of explaining that.

And saying that 'mones got their name from Paul doesn't mean Beatles were more influential. That's a laughable argument.

what's a laughable argument is you saying that you don't ask who WAS more influential but who people THINK was more influential.

of course people are going to tell you what they THINK, because nobody has a direct hotline to ultimate truth and reality beyond thought. what the fuck!

 
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|