[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

so after watching them all I have two conclusions:

a) They should have interviewed more historians, relatives, first-hand witnesses, etc etc instead of relying so heavily on the writer Duncan for interviews, I thought it was rather low-quality to have the primary interviewee be the head writer of the script. It is lacking in out-side sources which would have been more insightful and entertaining.

b) it was too much boring boring boring biography. I thought it was going to document all the beautiful wonders in each parks and give a bit of story and background and geology about them. that would have been MUCH better, sort of like what PBS aired a few years ago about the Natural Parks in detail.. I wanted to see the parks and all the vistas and sites, not all the historical personages..