09.05.2013, 03:17 PM | #1 |
children of satan
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 393
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.10.2013, 08:36 AM | #2 |
empty page
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1
|
I ask this not as a partisan individual but simply as a curious American. I suppose some of the public can connect to her on a social level; as some of her struggles and issues in family life mimics many of our own. And I understand that she may also hold the same religious beliefs as many of us do. But what about her ability to run the country not based on those attributes? So far from her and especially in the convention she has not yet had an interview nor answered a question. Pretty much what we all have heard is speeches. Now although this may not be completely bad, it does not speak about her own beliefs on the current state of the country and where she would intend to take it if she happened to become president. . . I have read that partly because of the media attacking her that they have restricted her answering questions until it calms down. But I do not think it will ever calm down even if it is negative and I detest the negative coverage especially on family. The public wants to know who she is which I think the majority of the public still do not know. And I have watched every bit of speech and coverage on her. I am not biased and I have a very open mind but I want to hear some policy. We have some serious problems now and I want to hear where things could and would go. But this brings to my question as to why so many people like her? Is it simply because she is a woman or something else? . . I fear that if it is because of just that, we are getting excited over someone we really do not know quite yet. Personally, i will reserve judgment and see her as she is once I hear what her policies are and what she plans to do. Until then, I will just wait for that to come. . Added note: Remember we all have heard her story and surely some of the things she has and has not done. What I want and what I think most people do not know either is her policies. Where does she stand on the important issues that make our future?. . Economy? . Energy?. Housing market?. Education?. . Policy people. Just that..
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.10.2013, 09:31 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,055
|
She is against mandatory insertion into the population of behavior-modification nanodust/chips that are controlled via wifi. She's got my vote.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.12.2013, 08:13 AM | #4 |
the end of the ugly
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Budapest city
Posts: 1,011
|
first gilmoure girls, then gossip girls, and now girls.
i see a pattern there. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.13.2013, 07:35 AM | #5 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,721
|
Quote:
What next? A role in a remake of Carry On Girls? |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.13.2013, 04:43 PM | #6 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 12,273
|
Remake of Golden Girls more likely
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.13.2013, 04:44 PM | #7 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,976
|
I hope she slaps some sense into Shosh
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.23.2014, 05:31 AM | #8 | |
little trouble girl
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stirling, Scotland
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
That would've been awesome, Shosh was so mean to Ray. I liked Kim's cameo though, it seemed appropriate/tasteful |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |