[ZEROpumpkins]

THE POPE??? AGAINST GAYS?!?! WHOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaAAAAAAAOOOOH

[✌➬]

Damn fudgepackers, causing all this drama.

[SpectralJulianIsNotDead]

Originally Posted by ZEROpumpkins

THE POPE??? AGAINST GAYS?!?! WHOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaAAAAAAAOOOOH

Yeah I was really surprised. . .

[SpectralJulianIsNotDead]

Originally Posted by DeadDiscoDildo

Yeah, who fucking cares. Is it news that Christians are against homosexuality?

Just let them do their thing while you do your thing for fucks sake.

That's a generalization. There are quite a few more liberal denominations that are totally OK with homosexuality.

[Alex's Trip]

If the bible adapts to th culture that reads it then why havent they found interpertations that include agnosticism of some form, or acknwledge and account for the fact that science is beginning to theorize on things that created the universe without the idea of a god?

I don'tj know if that made sense.

[ZEROpumpkins]

Originally Posted by SpectralJulianIsNotDead

That's a generalization. There are quite a few more liberal denominations that are totally OK with homosexuality.

Exactly. Some people are level headed.

I've had awesome homosexual sex all night. Take that, nazi bitch!
RIVERS OF HOMOSEXUAL MALE SPERM.

[diskaholic-anonymous]

let me remind that kind of leader of that church : i don't why but Jesus was always surround by 12 men, and there was a lot of moments of privacy between them ( what they have done in those lonely moments, we will never know) - i'm going to hell cause of that? - but the bible is far away from that arcaic matters of this catholic church, the only thing that book promote is love between humans, but humans just promote evol between them!!!
fuck you homos! fuck you straights! fuck you popes! fuck you chikens! fuck you fuckers! fuck the word fuck! fuck!
peace!

[SpectralJulianIsNotDead]

Originally Posted by Alex's Trip

If the bible adapts to th culture that reads it then why havent they found interpertations that include agnosticism of some form, or acknwledge and account for the fact that science is beginning to theorize on things that created the universe without the idea of a god?

I don'tj know if that made sense.

actually it has to some sense
There are some who would suggest
that Genesis isn't literal

And there are some that have rationalized that you don't know that God exists, but for whatever reason, you believe God does exist.

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by pbradley

It isn't a living text when it is read as an absolute.

IT IS NEVER READ AS AN ABSOLUTE. That is impossible.

This is because Individuals both read and hear readings of the Bible, and these make their own interpretations of the meanings of the text, bringing it into their lives directly in their own personal ways. The bible means a different thing to EVERY individual reader or listener who is its audience. Further, it is not archaic, in the sense that is is read CONSTANTLY, by literally billions of people, EVERY SINGLE DAY, and has been for over a thousand years at least.

What other piece of literature, or any piece of art for that matter, is so fundamentally a part of the universal human experience like that? What ancient text is so elaborately an integral part of the lives of people so far removed from its origins? What other ancient text is so widely translated and updated to reflect the etymological changes of language over time? given the circumstances, I think that nothing in human creation is more the opposite of archaic.

[the ikara cult]

Pope in ridiculous statement shock