 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does length matter? | |||
| More than 75 minutes |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 60-75 minutes |
  
|
8 | 16.00% |
| 45-60 minutes |
  
|
31 | 62.00% |
| Less than 45 minutes |
  
|
11 | 22.00% |
| Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
09.04.2006, 02:11 AM
|
#41 |
|
bad moon rising
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 138
  |
45 to 60 seems good.
though i like any time, if the music is good
__________________
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
|
09.04.2006, 05:34 AM
|
#42 |
|
empty page
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
|
64 minutes and 59 seconds.
|
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
|
09.04.2006, 04:08 PM
|
#43 | |
|
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,666
|
Quote:
Deftones' Around The Fur has, like, 30 mins in between "MX" and the hidden track, which is way too long...it's not even that good. 4 mins max between the last listed track and the hidden track should be the rule. But as far as the whole album goes, it really depends on the band, although Tool's latest does seem a bit long-winded at times... |
|
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
|
09.04.2006, 04:17 PM
|
#44 |
|
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New England.
Posts: 4,027
|
I always shoot for atleast 40 minutes, but an hour is just better. Better than that is filling the disc.
|
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
|
09.05.2006, 09:13 AM
|
#45 |
|
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
43 minutes and 40 seconds.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
