06.18.2007, 02:42 PM | #1 |
Posts: n/a
|
There are very few albums that I can think of without one or two stinkers, at least. Is the whole concept of a perfect album sustained enough by the sheer amount of them? I think not.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 02:47 PM | #2 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
|
Very true. The nearest I've ever come to hearing a perfect album is Now That's What I Call Music Volume 8.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 02:53 PM | #3 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,664
|
Yes. Also no. I like singles. But yes and also no.
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here. Quote:
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 02:56 PM | #4 |
the end of the ugly
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: i am not going to tell you
Posts: 962
|
amzing album
__________________
S I T M F T J |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 02:56 PM | #5 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,290
|
Having it be "about songs" is what spawned a whole culture of people paying MORE for an inferior product, and sacrificing their attention span while giving themselves a tin ear.
T he album format at least documents a creative phase in a band or artist's existence, whether it is a "concept album" or not. True, most albums will have a song or two you don't like as much, but I can think of quite a few rock-solid albums. And I love a successfully pulled-off concept LP. Edit: I do like when a big "hit single" isn't on an LP, like "20th Century Boy." |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:03 PM | #6 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,976
|
I prefer perfect albums.
albums with some great songs and some obvious stinkers irritate the shit out of me. Ritual de lo Habitual is perfect hairway to steven is perfect Yr Living all over me is perfect Document is perfect of course these are just opinions. if a band is going to release an album of music I want an album's worth of good fucking songs.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:07 PM | #7 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
|
I don't think the problem is with albums, so much as that they're getting longer. Early 'classic' albums rarely lasted longer than 40 minutes. Now, with the advent of CDs, it's not unusual for an album to stretch past the hour - the average length of what used to be called a double album. Even the likes of Led Zep, Bob Dylan, The Beatles and The Stones struggled to fill a double album with quality, so how can we expect lesser acts to do it on a regular basis?
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:09 PM | #8 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,290
|
I am all for making albums shorter.
45-50 minutes is fine. Solid EPs can be pretty great too. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:14 PM | #9 |
Posts: n/a
|
[quote=demonrail666]I don't think the problem is with albums, so much as that they're getting longer.quote]
They 'got' longer for a number of years now. Space as been abused for over two decades or something like that. It's not as if it's a new thing anymore. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:16 PM | #10 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
|
Quote:
No, but it definitely seems to be a product of CDs ability to store more making demands on artists to fill it. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:19 PM | #11 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,976
|
it5 has been since CDs
being able to put uin 72 minute sof music makes artists lazy when they make their album cuts. they leave in songs that they have findness for but which do not work on the whole album. I prefer my albums in the 35-40 minute range. and the only double album the beatles ever did was the white album and it is a masterpiece, perfect in every way, change not a thing!
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:23 PM | #12 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:40 PM | #13 |
children of satan
Join Date: May 2007
Location: MPLS
Posts: 295
|
Sleep's Dopesmoker = all killer, no filler.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:41 PM | #14 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,816
|
my bands album is 36 minutes and one second. . .
it seems like a good length. long enough to actually have some depth to it and have a good anount of songs (6 4+minute songs, some 6 and 9 minute songs too) but short enough that you can listen to in one go. even on a short ride... thats the album length i like, in between 30-50 minutes. 54 minuts seems to be a standard rock album length... and yeah, i prefer perfect albums. i dont like GH usially, except for 60s bands, and blues singers, but they all released singles, so GH is the only way to hear most of em...
__________________
If there's been a way to build it, There'll be a way to destroy it, Things are not that out of control www.myspace.com/dellilahtheband www.myspace.com/lecirquedesvampiresmusic |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 03:44 PM | #15 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,580
|
there are a few albums that i think are perfect from start to finish with no bad tracks.
Pavement - Slanted & Enchanted Joni Mitchell - Blue Elliott Smith - Roman Candle, Elliott Smith, Either/Or, XO, Figure 8, From a basement on the hill Breeders - Last Splash Pixies - Doolittle It's a shame i can't add a single sonic youth album to this list. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 04:06 PM | #16 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,275
|
Quote:
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 04:32 PM | #17 |
the destroyed room
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wales
Posts: 650
|
yeah you are nuts to think no sonic youth albums would fit th.... thats a point, nothing is fucking perfect.. but for me it cuts the bullshit when you listen to an album. This idea that people have is because there are a lot of people out there that probably shouldnt be doing it. But theres no such thing as consistance and you know nothing about artistry without listening to an album in its entirity. As for album length thats all crap too. it may spoil a particular album or something but its each unto their own... Almost every one here conclusivly loves Diamond Sea but if that rule applied that's pretty much be the whole album. It's like if monet painted a landscape but instead just decided to paint a horse in the bottom corner. Though i'm sure it'd be a very nice horse.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 04:35 PM | #18 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,580
|
Quote:
yeah it's a shame on every single album they've done there is one song that i don't like. Murray Street is the album that came the closest to being perfect all the way through for me, But i don't like Plastic Sun very much. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 04:41 PM | #19 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,976
|
plastic sun is the most SONIC YOUTHesque song on murray street~! that album's full of naptime songs!~
hahhaha! my list of perfect sonic youth albums is sister evol bad moon rising daydream nation Confusion is Sex Rather ripped yeah, i said it. and as far as the thread was going, I agree with sarramkrop up to a point. It really ends up being about songs that last, but that applies only to the mass consciousness, and the m,ass consciousness never delves into albums to finsd non-hit songs that rule all. pavement's best songs were saved for their singles and EP's (non title tracks/b sides, etc)
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2007, 04:42 PM | #20 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,580
|
Quote:
really?, what ones??? |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |