03.28.2006, 12:55 PM | #1 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,607
|
But I just can’t help myself.
Does it ever cross your mind that when you postulate on the meaning of an SY (or any band for that matter) album/song/lyric/relationship/quote/etc., if that band were reading those theories (which may very well be the case here), they’re shaking their heads and laughing? I realize that part of the point of ‘art’ is its subjectivity, its proclivity to interpretation. I know that’s the very purpose behind some of it. However When we start threads like “Do you think ‘Little Trouble Girl’ is an ironic comment on modern gender roles” blah blah blah, I can’t help but think, my god, are we presumptuous fuckers, thinking we have the right to impose our theories on someone else’s creation. I mean really, who the fuck am I to think I can for even a MOMENT guess what’s going on inside their heads when they’re recording an album? I know it irritates the hell out of me when other people presume to know what my behavioral motivations are. I’m picturing Thurston reading our Sonic Gossip section – “Little do they know I wrote half that album on the shitter.” While ‘art’ is a form of universal expression, conversely, it can also be highly personal to its creator. Naturally its patrons are going to espouse theories on its various aspects, but I wonder if a band thinks We shit it out You ingest it Then digest it Fucking like it Or don’t These are just random unformulated thoughts that will likely get me ostracized, but so be it. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 01:03 PM | #2 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 5,807
|
Good post, I've thought about this quite a bit as well. We pretty much only know the original meanings to the songs when they tell it to us through an interview or whatnot, and the rest you have to assume a meaning to the song. I remember on the old board there was a thread about bashing on people trying to interpret SY song meanings on www.songmeanings.com, but personally I think that you can interpret it however you want, and that's one of the joy's of music. I'm with you for the most part. I know if I took part in a popular band or music project and people attempted to interpret the meanings to my songs, I would probably find some of them rediculous, and I probably will laugh, but I would also respect their assumptions
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 01:28 PM | #3 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Birkenhead
Posts: 9,397
|
Quote:
I hope not! I can see your point, but I think the majority of lyrics are written around some kind of form or idea, and as such there will be some kind of meaning. This is especially apparant in a song like Youth Against Fascism, where the video also ties in ideas that are complememtary to the impression that the song gives. Apart from that, I think it's nice to see how different interpretations can arise - interpretations of a song will be a reflection not only of the song's contents but will also be an intellectual consequence of factors such as one's upbringing, education, society, personal relationships, religion etc etc etc. If I were the artist, I'd enjoy seeing what different interpretations people had of my product. I think. I think that lyrics, such as displayed in songs like Beauty Lies In The Eye or Chapel Hill for example, are evidently not the result of freeform creation - there's a subject that's being explored, and since we each have our own experience (or impression) of any given subject, we will each percieve things in a slightly different way. Or do I stand for everything you are railing against?
__________________
Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. http://www.flickr.com/photos/outsidethecamp/ |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 01:33 PM | #4 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,672
|
i typically dont even try to find a meaning, i think its pointless.
__________________
blind |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 01:39 PM | #5 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,755
|
Quote:
Nihilist!
__________________
rip |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 01:52 PM | #6 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 5,807
|
Quote:
I find that meanings enhance the whole concept of having vocals and lyrics in the song. Tt can portray messages that the artist intends for you to connect with, which is a constructive way of communication. I think meanings are great. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 01:54 PM | #7 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,607
|
Quote:
I agree with you - there's got to be something in observing the impact your 'product' has on its audience. Especially in the area of sociological observation, as you pointed out. Nor do I think that every piece, or necessarily any piece, is the result of freeform thought. I just think that, to a degree, it takes some real ballls to presume to know what the finer points of an artist's psyche are. What brought this all to mind was a thread asking what boardies thought about SY's relationship to the Grateful Dead, because of "Rather Ripped" (not that I'm at all criticizing the thread topic, I'm sure the person is genuinely curious). And I just thought, essentially, we can espouse all the theories we want, but in the end, it doesn't really matter what the fuck we think anyway, because unless someone from SY steps up and says, "Look shitbrains, this is why we chose that title," what's the point in surmising? We'll never know, it's just fodder for another pseudo-intellectual discussion topic. I can forget that sometimes, you can appreciate something on a purely visceral level, and to dissect it with fabricated knowledge can taint it. While I certainly don't ignore the substance within SY's music, or fail to give them credit for experimentation, often I listen to their music and think, "This is true rock." |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 01:55 PM | #8 |
the end of the ugly
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: i am not going to tell you
Posts: 962
|
I always try to find the meaning with no luck at all though
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 01:57 PM | #9 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,755
|
I agree with Ben-David. Sure, some songs have cool ideas behind them but I don't really care. I can understand knowing what "Hives Hives" or something where it is very obvious about and getting attached or drawn to the song because of that but I'm not a fan of analyzing songs and figuring stuff out. Especially music like Scissor Shock, Arab on Radar, or junk like that. I don't think there really is an intended meaning other than a bunch of random lyrics about sex and promiscuity.
__________________
rip |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 02:00 PM | #10 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 5,807
|
Quote:
easily detect a flat-footed traitor your mom is a co-conspirator her nonsense cannot prevent the prize fighter from fist fuckin your citizens quickly remove the punk drunken faggot and maintain a flat-footed status easily deter the citizen's maneuver your mom is a dictator her curfew cannot prevent the pigeon-toed daughter from getting fucked by a meat head quickly remove the punch drunken faggot and maintain a pigeon-toed Definately has no meaning, but still extermely enjoyable to listen to. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 02:14 PM | #11 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,607
|
Quote:
Sure it does - if you want it to. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 02:38 PM | #12 |
bad moon rising
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 101
|
There was this interview of PK Dick, where he was saying how the interpretation of his book by the academia were BS. It's easy to over-analyse music or lyrics. still, not *every* interpretation is valid. to say that Kill yr Idols bring to mind the death of Hector off the Iliad would be just crap.
Perceiving, "absorbing", a work of art is a creative process. That doesn't mean that anything goes though. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 02:41 PM | #13 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Birkenhead
Posts: 9,397
|
On the other hand, if I may opine, I think that if one doesn't read into music, if one doesn't find representations, then how will it ever be more than mere entertainment? How will it ever mean something to the listener?
__________________
Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. http://www.flickr.com/photos/outsidethecamp/ |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 03:06 PM | #14 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,544
|
Yeah. I rarely bother to try and read into the lyrics too much. I mean it's all down to personal interpretation and what they mean to you individually. I think you can get more than just entertainment out of music without reading into the lyrics. At least reading into them in a pro-active way....I certainly don't do that....I'm finding it hard to put it into words exactly.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 03:12 PM | #15 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,855
|
I rarely look for extra-musical meaning in SY. For me, I look for meaning in the music and not in "what it's about". This is part of the reason that I don't pay much attention to their lyrics.
Honestly, I don't think it matters much what SY meant by a song. What matters is what it means to you. In other words, what it means to SY isn't neccesarily the authoritative meaning. This type of thing is discussed quite a lot in literary theory circles. I guess when you guys are dissecting the lyrics, you're doing literary criticism. I prefer to stay away from that and keep my opinions strictly about the music. A book that would be enlightening, maybe (I haven't read it, but I mean to. I have friends that have read it, and like it): Is There a Text in this Class? : The Authority of Interpretive Communities by Stanley Fish Apparently, he talks in this book about exactly what Trunky is saying. The SY board is an "interpretive community"? I'm going to read this soon. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 03:16 PM | #16 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,544
|
Yes....pretty much what Noumenal said is what I was trying to get at really.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 03:23 PM | #17 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,290
|
Quote:
I hope you are not implying that only vocal/lyrical music can have any "meaning." |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 03:29 PM | #18 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 5,807
|
Quote:
True. It would be interesting to see what interpretations people would come up with for that song though |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 03:41 PM | #19 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: psycho battery
Posts: 12,161
|
the lyrics and the way i interpret the music changes so much everytime i hear it. i dont, or try not to look for too much meaning in them. sometimes thats hard to do. its hard to put into words what i actualy mean which is a problem i have.
sometimes the music makes me feel a certain way and the words certainly go with it, other times i find them oppressive and they dont add to my pleasure of wht i am hearing. its strange, i could talk about this subject a lot but i cant even begin to describe what i mean without coming accross as a total cock. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
03.28.2006, 03:54 PM | #20 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,607
|
Quote:
Ah, literary theory... My college days also came to mind with this topic. I will make the blanket statement that English majors are INSUFFERABLE. You'd sit through class after class, listening to some goatee-sporting jackass elucidate his enlightened theory about homoeroticism in Whitman's poetry. Thanks for sharing, but 1. Duh. 2. Just because the guy wrote "I Sing the Body Electric" doesn't mean he tries to cop a feel every time he goes to the harrier's. My point being, the construct of ANY media is highly subject to interpretation, and you could literally endlessly dissect a song. I agree, noumenal, that if any 'significance' is to be had from a song, it makes more sense for it to be personal, rather than a regurgitation of what it meant to the writer. I think it's ironically amusing that so many literary figures recognized this tendency to extrapolate unnecessarily on their work, and began writing tongue-in-cheek bits just to watch their readers flail in an academic cesspool of bullshit. Sometimes, things just are what they are. As John Cage said, "I have nothing to say and I am saying it and that is poetry." What's my underlying point? I'm not entirely sure. Maybe that John Donne is gazing down upon the millions of people salivating over his poetry, toking up a fattie, and thinking, "That poem's three lines long! Get a life, jackasses." |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |