12.09.2007, 02:34 PM | #1 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
|
The 50s had Sartre and Camus
The 60s had Marcuse The 70s - 80s had Foucault and Jameson The 90s had Zizek and (posthumously) Deleuze The 00s? Please God not Michael Moore, surely. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 02:48 PM | #2 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,358
|
naomi klein
noam chomsky norman mailer arundahti roy how's that for start |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 02:48 PM | #3 |
100%
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 784
|
i'd agree with chomsky.
__________________
She holds the room up by talk alone |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 02:56 PM | #4 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,358
|
the thread title was intellectual figurehead so michael moore is immediately discounted
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 03:01 PM | #5 |
100%
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 784
|
actually i suppose chomsky was most active in linguistics during the 60s and 70s - can he be considered "our time"?
__________________
She holds the room up by talk alone |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 03:07 PM | #6 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,784
|
jamie foxx
__________________
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 03:11 PM | #7 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,409
|
Jon Stewart or Lewis Black. Haha.
I don't see the obsession with the present. There is so much past to get up to date with, and by the time you're done with that, the present is in the past. Camus, Sartre, Nietszche, Kierkegaard, Descartes, and Socrates are all just as relevant now as they were in their own times, possibly moreso. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 03:22 PM | #8 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
|
That's probably true, and all the people mentioned so far have borrowed from those before them anyway. Even so, a generation usually either throws up or adopts an intellectual figurehead of its own. The 50s had the existentialists, the 60-70s had the new left, the 80s-90s the postmodern lot. I suppose today the dominant issue is globalization, so whoever it is it's going to come out of debates around that. Chomsky is the obvious candidate then, I suppose.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 03:35 PM | #9 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 4,300
|
Oprah
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 04:23 PM | #10 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,592
|
i'd agree with chomsky
add richard dawkins habermas michael gazzaniga! (neuroscientist) if you want political-- francis (yuck) fukuyama <- vomit-worthy, yet influential among the neocons that rule our time |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 05:09 PM | #11 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Omaha, Nebraska, USA
Posts: 3,063
|
I can't think of one. But the Chomsky love fest is sort of curious to me.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 05:16 PM | #12 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,212
|
Gary Kasparov
wiki: Kasparov announced his retirement from professional chess on March 10, 2005, to devote his time to politics and writing. He formed the United Civil Front movement, and joined as a member of The Other Russia, a coalition opposing the administration of Vladimir Putin. On September 30, 2007, Kasparov entered the Russian Presidential race, receiving 379 of 498 votes at a congress held in Moscow by The Other Russia. [1] Kasparov was arrested on November 24, 2007 by riot police in Moscow while trying to march on the federal election offices to present a letter of protest against Putin and the upcoming election[2], and was subsequently given a jail sentence of five days. [3][4] He was released from jail on November 29, 2007. [5] |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 05:20 PM | #13 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Omaha, Nebraska, USA
Posts: 3,063
|
Quote:
Nice choice! Interesting person, I didn't know of until last year. The only real voice of dissent in Russia. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 05:33 PM | #14 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aylmer(now Gatineau), Quebec
Posts: 1,756
|
Stephen Colbert!
__________________
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 05:53 PM | #15 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 3,615
|
odb!
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 05:54 PM | #16 | ||
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,212
|
Quote:
Quote:
Why not Michael Moore? I guess you're too afraid of what some turds might think. Or perhaps he just didn't fit your cookie-cutter notion of an ivory tower intellectual like the rest on your list. At any rate, he's scapegoated just like Socrates was in his day and it's better to be a gadfly than a fly. I've read a lot of Sartre and Camus. Sure, there's some valid stuff to ponder, but they each perverted existentialism quite a bit with atheism and humanism. At least Camus rejected nihilism and Marxism and like Kierkegaard, despises Hegel. Marcuse is an intellectual rabble-rouser Marxist that perverts Wittgenstein. |
||
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 05:55 PM | #17 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,212
|
Quote:
No thanks. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 06:00 PM | #18 |
100%
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 784
|
i'd add susan sontag, john berger, gore vidal...
__________________
She holds the room up by talk alone |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 06:01 PM | #19 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,409
|
Quote:
Velly Velly Intellesting. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
12.09.2007, 06:02 PM | #20 | |
100%
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 784
|
Quote:
__________________
She holds the room up by talk alone |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |