![]() |
#2861 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I love Speak, Memory. What else have I read? Transparent Things. Interesting, but not great. I think I tried Ada and got bored. That might be about it, actually. What Nabokov should I go to next? Personally, I recommend starting with Geronimo. It's his most straightforward narrative, but it is a wild ride, pretty fantastical and sprawling. A great look at the South in the 1950s. I like Ray a lot, though it's experimental. And his collection of short stories is fantastic--Airships. In fact, maybe start with that and Geronimo. You can delve into a few of the short stories between chapters of Geronimo. You have to be in the right mood for Updike. I have to be very relaxed, willing to let him pile on the descriptive detail he loves so much. Once I "got" why he was using detail, I could enjoy it. His details don't always have to do with the plot or characterization so much as it is a celebration of the details in everything, the idea of trying to pay attention to everything, to taking in as much as you can.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2862 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,879
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I really like Nabokov's early, Russian books. They are short and punchy. Might as well start in chronological order, but DESPAIR, DEFENSE, and INVITATION TO A BEHEADING are perhaps my favs. (THE GIFT is his last Russian book. Like ADA, it's great but a tad dull, ifyouknowwhatImean.)
Also, his short story collection is a must have. Seriously. Buy it now. He did loose his strength as he got older. Post-Lolita, PNIN and PALE FIRE are the only really great ones. What Martin Amis have you read? His early stuff, at least, strikes me as the prose of Updike's and Nabokov's bastard child. By the way, I'm almost ALWAYS in the mood for Updike. I'll get cracking on the Hannah. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2863 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
nice reading list, "amerikanistic" except for the niche crap. o well. not your fault. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2864 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,305
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
finally got a book of Updikes, early short stories, never read him before.......just picked up one Zola I hadn't read, The Belly of Paris, and another Bolano, Last Evenings on Earth, but still finishing a 400 page history of New World Slavery that, although densely written, as say a textbook, provides so much history that I didn't know, has proven itself well worth wading thru..... |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2865 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
oh, you lucky bitch, i wish i had time to read like that these days and before anybody complains with politically correct platitudes, by "bitch" i mean this: ![]() or was it this, i don't remember.... ![]() anyway... bitch! you're lucky... all that time to read... |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2866 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,879
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
What's "niche crap?" |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2867 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
oh this nasty little racist practice of ghettoizing writers by ethnicity or sexual orientation or what not, both marginalizing good writers as provincial and elevating bad writers to the canon because they are some sort of minority. writers are either good or sucky. take for example jhumpa lahiri-- she's fucking fabulous. i enjoyed reading "the namesake" immensely. it's one of the few contemporary books i have actually been able to read from cover to cover. and yet she is put in the "asian-american" pile together because she happens to write about the immigrant/first generation experience. she belongs in the contemporary pile instead of all that macsweeney self-indulgent white bullshit (there i go with the ethic shit-- but it makes sense in the context). similarly, maya angelou... the lady is nice but... why should anyone read her? because she's "african american"? where the fuck is langston hughes? he should go on the modernist pile with all the other good ones. philip roth and saul bellow, such tremendous figures in, i don't know what category, are put as "jewish writers" whereas woody allen is a "postmodernist". ayayay... fucking niche/ghetto shit. there is also some crap on "hispanic literature" that nobody should be required to read but it's there because "it's hispanic". yes, my panic. for the record, i haven't slept since saturday and i'm quite incoherent but my rage isn't. okay maybe it is, but it all makes sense to me. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2868 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,879
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kinda sorta makes sense to me. Sorta. Kinda.
Let me be a little incoherent: For the purposes of a class, I can see why one would read Bellow along with Roth, if anything to compare and contrast. A writer's background informs the texts. What's the big whoop? In my experience, it's rare for a writer to be celebrated merely because of background. There are a ton of black writers, but not all of them get into the canon, nor should they. (I agree about the Hughes, by the way.) The thing is, if the syllabus was just one big list of titles--no catagories--most of the authors would end up on the list anyway, I think (although I disagree with some of the titles: Roth has written better books since GOODBYE, and FALLING MAN is the worst thing Dellio's written in years,for example. Still, a good student of American lit can't avoid reading something by either writer). "Niche" makes it sound like these minority writers aren't essential to the American Literature story. I strongly disagree. The only problem I see is when a dumbfuck reader would say something like, "Oh, I don't care for Jewish American writers." The Namesake dissapointed me, but only because her short story collections are outstanding. I'm rambling. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2869 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
namesake was brilliant, i read it before the interpreter of maladies so the stories suffered by comparison, presenting less developed characters. the dad especially i thought was cool as fuck on the inside but an uncool stoic on the outside. and gogol's struggles with his "american" girlfriend and the parallel with the indian girl he grows up with was great-- a kind of aborted-assimilation story with 2 instruments (or 3 or 4, depending on how you count).
of course the minorities belong in teh canon-- they belong at the very fucking center of it is my point. my problem with literary ghettos is two-fold ("two-handed"?): on the one hand, mediocre writers and poets become canonized by virtue of being members of a "deserving" ghetto, and they subsequently "represent" poorly; on the other hand, great writers and poets who happen to be members of minority groups get demoted to the ghetto instead of being place at the fucking epicenter of literature where they belong--e.g., "kafka, the czech jew who wote in german". a provincial writer? |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2870 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
literature is dead (to me) (not really) (well almost) why don't you study tv then? -- reading is a fucking aristocratic pleasure. enjoy it while you can. -- but tv people make more money :/ |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2871 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good luck with the degree. Looking through the book lists it's a subject I'd have loved to have done myself.
I don't really see what all the fuss is with this niche thing. Of course they're problematic; they can distort or exclude or be reductive but it'd be almost impossible to navigate or organise a topic as broad as literature, without them. There'll always be differences of opinion regarding what's included and what isn't (I thought it odd, for example, that no mention was given to the Beats in the American list) but that just contributes to the fun of debate and highlights the ongoing openness of the canon. No course can cover everything and there's always the case for claiming the validity of something that's left out over something that isn't. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2872 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,261
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() I hope the romance continues!
__________________
http://jennthebenn.tumblr.com/ |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2873 | ||
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
prolly a good thing you didn't go straight into film. those schools are mostly useless. not a bad idea to start with literature actually. you get a better understanding of character and story and all that. and i love books, don't get me wrong, it's that it's hard for me to find things i enjoy anymore. i'm like a tired spent jaded whore when it comes to reading. so what's this story with your having brothers all over the planet? was your dad a traveling salesman? or do you belong to a religious cult? Quote:
sure! i got some sleep so i am less cranky today. ha! im all for having a fluid canon of course, it's the ghettoization that bugs me. see? "here's the canon-- and here's the cannon for the little people who couldn't cut it but we have to mention them out of political correctness" zadie smith-- does she belong to contemporary literature or is she an "anglo-afrocaribbean woman writer" (or whatevers)? -- side note: the the the hm hm err eh.. oh yes! i had this friend who studied british literature and being into theory shit she looked at the sociology & institutions & things. one thing she mentioned to me once was that when an irish/scottish/welsh writer/poet was new etc. it was classified as "provincial" but when they got famous they suddenly become "english literature". and funny thing, one of the earliest reviews of joyce published he's cast as some sort of talented irish wildman lololol ghetto/not-ghetto. burn the fucking ghetto. it's just good/no good. --- ps - did you notice the "anglistik" list has no ghetto? it's just the american one that does. oy....! |
||
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2874 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
and what about the ostrogoth i mean ostralian? you said somewhere. "favorite" etc. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2875 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
oh! they are not your brothers but your bros. okay! |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2876 | ||
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
One of the obvious problems with this ghettoisation is that it confines writers from ethnic minorities to what they 'ought' to be writing about, and to the style with which they write it. It's not enough that Zadie Smith should be a black writer, she's also expected to focus her writing on a black topic (or what a largely white literary establishment think is a black topic, or style). We've joked about this in the past, the way that Latin American writers only really qualify as such if they write from a supposedly Latin American 'magical' perspective. We could equally say that being a Jewish writer has more to do with expressing a certain 'Jewish neurosis' that's easily recognised by gentiles, than it has to do with anything else. It must be a real problem for any black writer not that interested in adapting an oral tradition that supposedly underpins their culture, or a Jewish writer not overly preoccupied with their mother, and so on. It's everywhere in culture, from world music to art cinema, to the whole manga craze in the West: that to be considered commercially viable an artist from a minority or marginal background is expected to promote a certain sense of their nationality or ethnicity in a way that foreign consumers can recognise and which satisfies their fetish for some kind of pure, authentic 'otherness'. It's like theme park culture. Go to Stratford Upon Avon and see it's been reinvented as 'Ye Olde English Village', purely to satisfy American tourists who want to wallow in a very American idea of Shakespeare's 'Englishness'. Quote:
I don't know but it wouldn't surprise me if that does take place. Although it's a similar problem as before: Joyce is probably just as much fetishised for his perceived 'Irishness' (whatever that may be) as for his purely literary innovations. |
||
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2877 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
let's fucking burn and destroy culture! ![]() |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2878 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,879
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[quote=!@#$%!]let's fucking burn and destroy culture!]
I was going to write, "This is all academic. Read what you dig and fuck the rest," but this makes sense too. Glad you slept. There are much more important things to get worked up over than this stuff. (And I write this as someone who bleeds literature.) One little item: I knew absolutely nothing about Z. Smith when I first read White Teeth, and I assumed she was Indian! I think ethnic writers choose to write about their ethnicity. Or not. I mean, Paul Auster's Jewish but you'd never know it by reading the fiction. And even explicitly Jewish writers, for example, take a break now and then. I guess I'm thinking of Bellow's Henderson the Rain King which is not the least bit "Jewish," but there are lots of other examples. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2879 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rennes, France
Posts: 1,264
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm finishing Assaf Gavron's Ein schönes Attentat.
It's well conceived, yet I feel embarrassed by what his male characters say/think about their female counterparts. I'll be reading Eugenides' The Marriage Plot and Jean-Luc Benoziglio's Cabinet portrait (an unemployed estranged man packs up 25 volumes of an encyclopedia in the building restrooms, and stays there to read). Reading through halfeatencake's list : if you dig Dos Passos, move on to the USA trilogy. If you don't, move on to the USA trilogy. And on a sidenote, I tried to read Fitzgerald's Tender Is the Night in English. I bought a copy of a Penguin edition and it was reorganized! In its chronological order! How can anyone do that to this book? The niche thing exists in France too. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2880 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,744
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |