08.01.2015, 12:41 PM | #36621 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 12,279
|
Quote:
Do you not enjoy it because you're older or because you took it too many times when you were younger? I know a surprising (actually surprising) amount of people over thirty who take acid on the reg (a few times/year) and do so because they thoroughly enjoy it. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.01.2015, 02:03 PM | #36622 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,147,485,022
|
Quote:
oh maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannn...... i spend a day with 2 friends i know since a kid but probably dont know them that well? this one.. we were talking about various stuff, i so not agreed with him at almost everything drugs - was saying that i wish i could try LSD and many other things he was questioning WHY? since you are that old anymore why the need. fixing your tits- HE: why should a woman over some age (40-50-60) fix her tits, since they arent in any use anymore!? I MEAN CMON DUDE... |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.01.2015, 02:45 PM | #36623 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
|
Quote:
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2015, 04:55 AM | #36624 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,580
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2015, 09:08 AM | #36625 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 12,279
|
Quote:
Well, next time you come to London.... |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2015, 09:13 AM | #36626 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 12,279
|
Quote:
Yeah, i understand that the time commitment is makes it a bigger deal. But what do you mean by hard drugs and the insinuation that other drugs are more appropriate for adults? |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.06.2015, 01:17 PM | #36627 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
Howdy!
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.28.2015, 08:10 PM | #36628 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
This one's for Genteel Death. How you call your lover boy?
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.28.2015, 11:21 PM | #36629 |
the end of the ugly
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: melbourne
Posts: 947
|
do you actually think you're well dressed?
__________________
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.29.2015, 07:44 AM | #36630 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
Ha ha, are you kidding?! Good God, no, man--how boring. I think I am "dressed," however, which is more than I can say for 90 percent of the population these days, unless you count pajamas, sweat pants, and Steelers sweatshirts as "dressed."
And since you ask, I feel compelled to give you a fuller answer. I am not well-dressed, at least, as an objective or as my normal mode of operating. I do feel, however, that I have style. There is a big difference between well-dressed and having style, and while one can do both, I tend to WANT the latter over the former. Here's why: Style requires versatility, consistency, and appreciation, and it can be challenging. It often pushes the boundaries of what we consider classic and timeless dressing, even the boundaries of being "well dressed," as you so simply put it. This is also what separates style from fashion. Fashion can be confrontational for the sake of it, fashion can push boundaries that do not need to be pushed, and it can be both fully fantastic and brutishly awful. I don't like fashion. I do like style, which, in my case, is based mainly in American "trad" or early Ivy League and some prep. SO... well dressed. Nah. That doesn't matter to me much. The well-dressed man is often in the same attire, day in and day out, safely wearing the conventional and the inoffensive. I am not that man. Some of my outfits are "safer" and more conventional than others. Some are complete failures, because I take risks, and yes, I am the first to admit it, I don't always know what the hell I'm doing. But therein lies all the fun. I wonder how much fun the "well-dressed" man has?
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.29.2015, 08:14 AM | #36631 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,744
|
I like the way gmku dresses.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.29.2015, 09:54 AM | #36632 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cybatraz!
Posts: 11,537
|
Quote:
dig that coast so hard. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.29.2015, 10:14 AM | #36633 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
|
That coat gets more comments than anything I wear. My wife dislikes it, but out in the world, I actually get compliments on it. True story: I was wearing it this week, as shown in pic above, and a college girl walking down the street turned from talking with her friend to smile at me and say, "Sweet blazer!" I'll live on that moment for the next 10 years!
I wore it the next day and a bank teller told me she liked my "style... especially that jacket." It's by a brand I'd never heard of. E.J. Peake, but I've researched it, and apparently it was either a department store or a men's store, now defunct, most robust in the 1960s. This jacket is a two-button sack cut (meaning undarted) from around 1965. Three-button sack cuts, where the third top button is hidden under a lapel that rolls, were very common in the 1960s, but the two-button sack is a bit of a rarity and rather sought after by people like me who are into the old Ivy style. It has this cool silk lining with medallion imprints, a kind of sport coat lining that was common back then, hardly seen now. The fit is spot on, neither too tailored looking nor too boxy, and it's in perfect condition, as if it came right off the store rack--not bad for something that's almost as old as I am. I wear the heckfire out of it. I bought it from a vintage consignment shop for about $30--probably what it retailed for in 1965!
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.01.2015, 05:54 PM | #36634 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
|
That moment you realize you dress like Eric Matthews
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.01.2015, 07:31 PM | #36635 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,152
|
Quote:
Would you rather dress like Corey?
__________________
Shake shake |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.01.2015, 07:35 PM | #36636 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
|
Or even worse Mr Turner
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.26.2015, 08:25 PM | #36637 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: fucking Los Angeles
Posts: 14,801
|
__________________
Today Rap music is the Lakers |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.30.2015, 06:16 AM | #36638 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cybatraz!
Posts: 11,537
|
repost. it's me with mah aminals. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.30.2015, 06:17 AM | #36639 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cybatraz!
Posts: 11,537
|
Quote:
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
09.30.2015, 08:28 AM | #36640 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,990
|
Quote:
The shrooms are "softer" in a way, they ease up softer, and they allow you to sleep after 3-4 hours, and you sleep well. LSd is more hard edged, comes in several different stages, and will keep you awake for 6-10 hours, depending on dose, and quality. adulterated LSD brings bad headaches, teeth grinding, anxiety and makes it very hard to sleep afterwards. Oh, and you sweat while you sleep it off..... acid sweats!
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |