![]() |
#21 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 12,246
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
well anyone who thinks haino is talentless is an idiot, but then knowledge of music theory is not a way to measure talent either. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#22 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 5,155
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yeah ive studies music theory at school, and to be honest, for the most part it bored. i found that when im trying to understand and read and write music, the joy of making music is somewhat lost. id much rather just chill out, lite a joint or somethin, sit down with my guitar, and start messing around with chords and riffs and wait untill i find something special. but, my knowledge of music, well, i have some. enough id say.
__________________
![]() listen to pink reason |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#23 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,948
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I know theory, and playing, and performing, and song construction, and harmonizing, and all that shit. it benefits my appreciateion of complex music, and does nothing for my appreciation of simple music., which I enjoy on a visceral level.
sonic youth's 12 tone experiments versus dead kennedy's "dog bite" for instance
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#24 |
Posts: n/a
|
Anyone who seriously thinks that they can play in a good band by just sitting down and talking about it without playing their instruments first is a seriously misguided person. I can't see many people delivering any goods if they just sit down 'imagining' what it's like to play an instrument or 'theorising' shit all the time that ultimately doesn't translate into good records/ live gigs etc.
I'm surprised Sonic Youth get lumped into the 'music theory' thing, since, by their own admission, they have never been one of those bands to just sit down and decide to make music. They just did and took it from there. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#25 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,948
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
that is not what music theory is sarramkrop.
music theory helps you construct your music as you are writing it, it is a concurrent process, it can help to create a finely crafted song a la Steely dan or it can help to create the duodecatonic freakouts of schoenberg or Bartok's freaked out quartets. a little knowledge of music thery can make a bland rock song really ZING, really shine.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#26 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I know very well what music theory is, you patronising git. ![]() It's rock music and all its guises I'm talking about here, so the whole debate about, erm , important music is one that is irrelevant to what i posted earlier. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#27 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
BULLSHIT. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#28 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,662
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, I know how the E major scale goes. Will that do?
*silence* I'll get me coat. Technique and theory can be dead useful to getting a musician to get to a place where they can truly express themselves (whether it be John Coltrane or Diamanda Galas), but of course it's the initial emotional/visceral passion from the musician that should count first and foremost. As for the vast hordes of sub-sub-sub-Page/Clapton/Yngwie widdle merchants that have befouled the air over the years, they should either be forced to spend a year in retreat listening to nothing but The Shaggs, or be nibbled to death by particularly amorous panda bears.
__________________
Snow on Easter Sunday - Jesus Christ in reverse. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#29 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,662
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
*Melly high-fives sarramkrop, before falling asleep on his keyboard*
__________________
Snow on Easter Sunday - Jesus Christ in reverse. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#30 |
Posts: n/a
|
I've deleted that post because I bet then you'd get the usual debate about ''higher'' forms of music other than rock etc. You know what i mean, though, since we've had similar conversations before.
high-five anyway! |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#31 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 28,843
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just thinking of people I would consider musical geniuses... beefheart, sun city girls, jandek, john fahey... none of those people had any musical training whatsoever and probably knew jack shit about theory...
But I think most people need a LITTLE bit of theory, in the same way most people need religion. It's good to not go into things completely blind. If you're not going to be a technical virtuoso, at least have plenty of great ideas... |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#32 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,948
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
it is true! that is where many great ideas come from! once you know the musical "rules" yuo know the very best way to break the aforementioned rules to achieve the effect you desire.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#33 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,948
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
knowing jack shit about theory when you start is a different deal than staying ignorant about theory as you progress. captai beefheart, jandek, etc, all became better "players" just because you cannot help but learn theory as you progress in songwriting and ideas and readinga bout music and such.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#34 |
Posts: n/a
|
Maybe it's me but technical ability is not necessarily tied up to theoretical knowledge. Anyone is able to operate machinery the correct way without having a particualrly insightful knowledge of the mechanics that make up the machinery itself, so being a skilful musician can and does exist without any particular knowledge of theory. If you read the instructions of something to make it work, you're not exactly reading about the theory that created it, are you?
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#35 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Either you can't articulate yourself when need be or you are just making this stuff up. Can you provide anything that documents any association of music theory with any of the names that you've mentioned? |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#36 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,948
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
music theory is just the study of tones and sounds and their spatio/sonic relationship. some tone combinations create a sense of peace in our ears, some create love, some create urgency, etc. balladeers and shit ahve been using the exact same 3-4 chord progressions for centuries because these set chord progressions, by their inherent sonic quality, affect humans the same every day, every century.
even the most basic player is using music theory whether he/she knows it or not. a player of an instrument cannot help but learn some basic music theory just by virtue of practice and exposure to playing different new pieces.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#37 |
Posts: n/a
|
Not at all. I'm surprised you of all people being a Beatles fan would come up with that sort of stuff. Answer the question i've asked earlier: do you have any proof that Beefhart or Jandek are theory-savvy musicians?
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#38 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,948
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
did I say they were theory savvy? re-read my post. I said that due to playing an inst4rument they have learned some music theory. it HAPPENS. especially if you are a songwriter, and not just a player/performer.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#39 |
Posts: n/a
|
Paul MacCartney famously can't read music, or certainly couldn't while he was in The Beatles. Duh? What are you trying to say there?
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#40 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,948
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
reading mnusic is not music theory. understanding the relationships between chords, tones, harmonies, etc, IS music theory and paul learned a LOT through his playing.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |