06.16.2006, 01:02 PM | #41 |
empty page
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
|
i like sonic youth
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.16.2006, 01:27 PM | #42 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,204
|
Quote:
I can play that on standard too. Look at what you tabbed out. Its just a bunch of root and fifths (=powerchord) It doesnt warrant the use of alternate tuning.... |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.16.2006, 02:47 PM | #43 |
the destroyed room
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 627
|
i'm the other guy who can play some SY songs with standard tunnings...
i can play sunday (i posted some chords time ago), and some thurston songs from Psychic Hearts ...
__________________
The guitar guy played real good feedback and super sounding riffs...
Pabst blitzer!
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.16.2006, 04:29 PM | #44 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,204
|
Quote:
i can play the intro, main progression, and chorus in standard. And no thats not how I play the intro. The fact is you cant get the same exact octaves as the song, but you can get the main idea down and to a casual fan probably pass it off as how they play it. I dont see how this warrants the use of alternate tuning. The tuning is irrelevant for the song. Thurston wasnt thinking how weird he could get it sound. He was thinking of how to play a V- IV- I progression in A followed by the IV chord of D. Why do you think people think U2 copied off the chorus riff. Because it can be easily immiated in standard.... |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.16.2006, 04:39 PM | #45 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,204
|
your intro tab is wrong anyway....
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.16.2006, 07:32 PM | #46 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,204
|
sgfh
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.16.2006, 07:38 PM | #47 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,204
|
and im thinking about recording it. The intros tricky in standard but can be done if I practice, im not going to bother with the solo licks if I record, just the meat of the song...
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.16.2006, 09:10 PM | #48 |
little trouble girl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Teresina, Piaui , Brazil
Posts: 76
|
interesting topic and i do agree with who create it.
though i don't think all the new songs are simple power-chords.... but the fact is that they don't seem to willing to explore the weird sound of a guitar in aternative tuning that they used to. i liked them better when they explore the advantages of a guitar in aternative tuning... |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.16.2006, 11:09 PM | #49 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,510
|
I guess the alternate tuning thing has become kind of gimmicky, but most bands have gimmicks now, most of them very un-innovative and boring; they all sound alike. At least SY has something to seperate themselves from the rest of the pack. Especially since a lot of "indie" bands have become increasingly popular. Sonic Youth still makes challenging and interesting music, and honestly, I don't care how they go about doing it. As long as it gets done, I'm happy.
__________________
"No way, man! Cuz dyin' would be a stone groove! Got any messages for Jimi Hendrix?" "Yes. Pick up your puppy." |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.17.2006, 05:44 AM | #50 | |
the destroyed room
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
I remember an interview to Lee and he said standard tuning has a standard sound. Nothing more true!
__________________
http://www.sonicurbs.com |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.17.2006, 01:33 PM | #51 | ||
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,664
|
Quote:
Derek Bailey. Derek Bailey. Derek Bailey. Need I go on?
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here. Quote:
|
||
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.17.2006, 02:02 PM | #52 |
empty page
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11
|
yes, you need. as brilliant as bailey was, his style of playing wouldn't really be suitable for playing what are still essentially rock songs. he was all about timbre and such rather than interjecting new harmonic and tonal possibilities into rock music.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.17.2006, 03:14 PM | #53 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,204
|
i hate when people criticize standard tuning. There are actually alot of stuff you can do with drones in standard just because of the way it is set up. Im not saying standard is superior, my guitar is usually in a sonic youth tuning or one of my own, but to just say standard is standard is a very lame excuse. And plus, nothing sounds better then some old fashioned country jams in standard tuning...
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.17.2006, 06:05 PM | #54 |
bad moon rising
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: back2Paris
Posts: 222
|
I think if people didn't misuse words we wouldn't have this lame debate :
- standard tuning has NOTHING to do with whether something is tonal or not : just because u use non standard tuning doesnt mean you make atonal music - that said, SONIC YOUTH has never been atonal. Yes of course, there's a non tonal part in almost every song but every song they did as SY(except those found in WM or NYCGF ) is TONAL : meaning it has a tonality. DDN is definitely TONAL (or MODAL depending on the song ). However the released SYR is rarely tonal. The reason why Sonic Youth (and they're far from being the only ones) uses alternate tunings is because : - Some chords are easier to play in a certain tuning - The harmonics when sounding the guitar aren't the same. This may seem obnoxious but you can't let people bullshit you with this tonal - non tonal stuff. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.17.2006, 06:33 PM | #55 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: baton rouge. the 225, big raggedy.
Posts: 2,731
|
Quote:
perhaps it's not an argument about tonality/atonality, but an argument over the actual tone or timbre of the notes at certain places on the instrument.
__________________
please do not misconstrue the previous statement as an invitation for same sex relations or as negative towards anyone of another sexuality. -cam'ron (formerly "no homo") |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.17.2006, 08:34 PM | #56 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,204
|
Quote:
lunberg no, your wrong. When the tones of a chord are in close-voicings, or non-standard scale tones they are considered atonal. Every song on Confusion is Sex LP has atonal guitar, if you want you can try and prove me wrong by mentioning a song or part of a song that has a chord or lick that has tones that can be found in a standard western scale during 1981 to 1983.... I do agree with your first sediment though. The tuning does not tell wheiter the song is tonal or not, for instance the SY EP has most songs in standard, and yet they are atonal... |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.17.2006, 08:36 PM | #57 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,755
|
Quote:
Lundberg fucked her.
__________________
rip |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2006, 02:34 AM | #58 |
stalker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On a large piece of rock in the Ocean
Posts: 403
|
Holy Hell? This thread sure turned into an argument pretty quickly. lol. Fucking guitarists. (being one, I understand.) Straight Burnt.
__________________
Jeg kysser katastrofer. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2006, 02:54 AM | #59 | |
the destroyed room
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
It was an interview to Derek Bailey, not Lee? I thought to remember well..........
__________________
http://www.sonicurbs.com |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.18.2006, 03:30 AM | #60 | |
little trouble girl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: corpus christi
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
good answer
__________________
lonely liberal in south texas |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |