[notyourfiend]

Originally Posted by floatingslowly

but internal testes don't make the man, or do they?

what makes a man & what makes a women? are you born or must you become that way? syg needs to start catching up on queer theory!

[Rob Instigator]

that runner is a herm. does the extra testosterone give shim an advantage?

[floatingslowly]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

that runner is a herm. does the extra testosterone give shim an advantage?

who cares about running, can she cook with it?

[floatingslowly]

Originally Posted by floatingslowly

also, while searching her name, google thought that I might like this instead: http://www.lulu.com/content/4956212

I don't, but you might.

in case you don't like clicking:

^^^ in case you don't like clicking on page two. no way am I letting this little gem fall off due to page-format.

futher reviews:

Amazing [ No Rating ] 9 Mar 2009 by steve O'hara

We raised 400$ for a church during the bake sale becuase people could not get enough of the cream cheese cookies we made. Thanks Semen cookbook

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by notyourfiend

what makes a man & what makes a women? are you born or must you become that way? syg needs to start catching up on queer theory!

and queer theory needs to catch up with science.

but anyway "man" & "women" are-- yes-- social definitions subject to politics.

but let's not overcomplicate the issue & bring lacan, foucault, & the whole bunch of wankers into this. pleeeeeeease....

[notyourfiend]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

and queer theory needs to catch up with science.

but anyway "man" & "women" are-- yes-- social definitions subject to politics.

but let's not overcomplicate the issue & bring lacan, foucault, & the whole bunch of wankers into this. pleeeeeeease....

you forgot judge judy

 

no but seriously...i won't get started in my criticism of science as a hierarchical knowledge source. i'd rather do my job work.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by notyourfiend

no but seriously...i won't get started in my criticism of science as a hierarchical knowledge source. i'd rather do my job work.

ok but before you go, remember:

humanities departments are more hierarchical than science! humanities journals do not require proof of anything-- just power--to publish something. oh yeah. the assholes are guilty of the crimes they denounce--the eye, the beam, however it is that goes-- yeah.

[notyourfiend]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

ok but before you go, remember:

humanities departments are more hierarchical than science! humanities journals do not require proof of anything-- just power--to publish something. oh yeah. the assholes are guilty of the crimes they denounce--the eye, the beam, however it is that goes-- yeah.

of course, i never excluded social science from my critique....those also get pretty fucked up.

a problem with most science is that even if it has been proved, the studies remain inaccessible to most people. most just believe blindly bc some scholar at a university did some test and published some paper that they will never read thus insinuating blah blah balh


okay, but really...i got some calls to make. c'ya!

[Glice]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

but let's not overcomplicate the issue & bring lacan, foucault, & the whole bunch of wankers into this. pleeeeeeease....

You see what you've done there? You've made me rise to the bait. Don't make me resort to calling you Ned again.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by notyourfiend

of course, i never excluded social science from my critique....those also get pretty fucked up.

a problem with most science is that even if it has been proved, the studies remain inaccessible to most people. most just believe blindly bc some scholar at a university did some test and published some paper that they will never read thus insinuating blah blah balh


okay, but really...i got some calls to make. c'ya!

not true about science-- it's the only source of knowledge that we have that is designed to subvert itself. corporate-funded studies excluded, of course...

the reason it "remains inaccessible to most people" is because most people don't care to learn shit about science and much rather spend the day watching soap operas.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p_tvjqSrBk

ok, i should go to work too... it's fucking noon already.

[Rob Instigator]

I agree. "most" people CHOOSE to stayignorant and uneducated about science and it's advancements, with the exception of the latest bullshit "health" or "beauty" advancements touted by the local news and oprah.

I say FUCK THOSE PEOPLE. They deserve their ignorant lives.

[Glice]

Many people choose to be ignorant over the incorrect use of possessive apostrophes on 'its'.

I say let those big gay bears carry on.

[Rob Instigator]

for real? I always thought it was it's for a singular, "science?"? damn. that's like half a point off on every english paper.

[pbradley]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

it's the only source of knowledge that we have that is designed to subvert itself.

Nonsense, philosophy has been subverting itself since before science was born!

As for Turing, something is better than nothing even though more is demanded. I hope this isn't an act of appeasement rather than genuine progress.

[Glice]

Yup. "Its" is the same as "his" or "hers" or "theirs".

A lesson learnt this evening, ladies and gents. Good work big gay Rob.

[Rob Instigator]

Originally Posted by pbradley

Nonsense, philosophy has been subverting itself since before science was born!

As for Turing, something is better than nothing even though more is demanded. I hope this isn't an act of appeasement rather than genuine progress.

philosophy is not knowledge, just THOUGHT.

[Glice]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

philosophy is not knowledge, just THOUGHT.

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

I agree. "most" people CHOOSE to stayignorant and uneducated about science and it's advancements, with the exception of the latest bullshit "health" or "beauty" advancements touted by the local news and oprah.

I say FUCK THOSE PEOPLE. They deserve their ignorant lives.

So that's a blindingly obvious grammatical error and a complete misapprehension. Yeah, FUCK THOSE people. They deserve their ignorant lives.

[Rob Instigator]

ya heard, nephew.

[floatingslowly]

Originally Posted by pbradley

As for Turing, something is better than nothing even though more is demanded. I hope this isn't an act of appeasement rather than genuine progress.

it was the result of a petition that's been going on for awhile.

I tried to sign it myself, but you had to be a UK citizen.

[Glice]

Gay marriage is legal in all of Great Britain. And they're legal in how many US states?