07.16.2009, 08:13 PM | #1 |
the destroyed room
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mid-Manhattan Library
Posts: 567
|
Will report back when it's over.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.16.2009, 08:29 PM | #2 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 6,157
|
IMO the production on it has aged a great deal, but the songs are killer.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.16.2009, 09:19 PM | #3 |
the destroyed room
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mid-Manhattan Library
Posts: 567
|
I can't write, damn meds. But I will try.
Goo is a lot like Dirty. I never noticed this because it came into my collection in 1995, after Dirty. I am one of the Dirty-era fans. I was born in '77, so I was too young to get on board the SY-mobile before that really. Though, of coourse there are probably fans who were a lot more precocious than I was. My entrance to alternative rock came through Blood Sugar Sex Magik by the Red Hot Chili Peppers. But this isn't a personal history. And yet there is no other way to describe an aesthetic experience than the personal way. Am I wrong? Maybe you could go historical. Or technical. OK, come to think of it there are a lot of ways to describe aesthetic experiences. But this post is about Goo. Goo came out in 1990. It is now 2009. ZEROpumpkins says the production hasn't aged well. Isn't there a story there? What is old about it? I am not doubting you ZEROpumpkins, just pushing for a more detailed explanation. Is it just the way it sounds, and that's all there is to say? maybe. It's hard for me to talk about Goo! I was going to do a tracklisting with comments but decided that would cut up the experience of the album too much. I came of age under the spell of Lou Reed's advisory re New York (his album of that name) that it should be listened to like a book. Am I fucked? Has Lou Reed fucked me up? Goo is a good "book", a book I would wear around my neck or keep under my tunic if I wore a tunic. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.16.2009, 10:41 PM | #4 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: baltimore, murderland by way of new york city
Posts: 1,454
|
Quote:
I know that Goo and Dirty are usually classified as being similiar. But, for some reason, I rarely associate them with one another. I've always favored Goo. Dirty feels a lot more....erm, produced. I guess that's what happens when Butch Vig is in the mix. Don't get me wrong, Dirty is a wonderful album but I've always been more capitivated by the material on Goo.
__________________
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.16.2009, 10:44 PM | #5 |
the destroyed room
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 572
|
Titanium Expose is really metallic. Heavy metal metallic. Moreso than Cross The Breeze.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.16.2009, 10:46 PM | #6 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: baltimore, murderland by way of new york city
Posts: 1,454
|
Quote:
On a side note, that video is pretty fucking kick ass. Even though watching Kim and Thurston make out makes me feel a lil like a voyeur...
__________________
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.16.2009, 11:37 PM | #7 | |
children of satan
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
Musically Goo and Dirty are much like the same. Maybe Goo is little bit more loose than Dirty. But what comes to the production, that is where they differ. Goo is produced more like SY's 80's albums, yet Dirty has lot more production work in it. I like Goo more than Dirty and maybe the reason is in how both records are produced. In Dirty there have been too many takes from each song in recording sessions, which have taken away the usual loose feeling of SY records. Also I think that Dirty's massive stadium sound is one thing that don't fit into music of Sonic Youth. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 12:58 AM | #8 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 6,157
|
cagedbird:
I guess my main beef is the heavy reverb sound that was pretty typical on 80's/early 90's albums, sounds really washed out but polished at the same time. That said I don't blame the youth, being on a major label probably had something to do with it. But music content? Damn! Such a step forward for them in style. A bit more structured than DDN but still with the trademark feedback and sonic jams. Dirty Boots? Classic. Disappearer? Classic. Mote? You better fucking believe it's a classic. Unfortunately it's let down by a couple of duds, particularly My Friend Goo. But I tend to ignore them, even my favourite youth album has a couple of misses IMO. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 02:53 AM | #9 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,036
|
I've always considered Goo my least favourite, but recent relistenings have made it one of my least favourites, with Dirty and Washing Machine (but perhaps surprisingly, I really like Jet Set). It has three fantastic songs on it, Titanium Expose, Mote, and Tunic, among the best from each vocalist. Unfortunately, it also has two of my least favourite SY songs - Mary-Christ (frustratingly annoying, gets stuck in your head) and Cinderella's Big Score. The others range from okay (Disappearer, Mildred Pierce) to unmemorable (Dirty Boots). I really quite like the production on there, it's a shame they didn't have that many great songs.
__________________
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 03:04 AM | #10 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 6,157
|
Mildred Pierce is the forgettable of all forgettables.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 04:07 AM | #11 |
the end of the ugly
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Budapest city
Posts: 1,011
|
i really like the vibe of the album - altho i hardly ever listen to it.
the production is shit as Zero said before. it sounds very fuzzy, but not in a good way. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 04:09 AM | #12 |
the end of the ugly
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Making The Nature Scene
Posts: 935
|
"Goo" was Sonic Youth's eighth album, and their first for DGC/Geffen. The album was their major label debut, and with arena rock staples like "Kool Thing" and "Dirty Boots" deep in its grooves, it allowed Sonic Youth to enter the mainstream world, destroy everything in their path, and emerge victorious, riding the top 10 charts to sonic stardom and glory" so happy they were...with this "kool thing". |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 07:17 AM | #13 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wexford, rep of ireland
Posts: 6,930
|
goo rocks...always has and always will! end of story!
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 07:57 AM | #14 | |
stalker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, presently
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
Call me a puss but this was my first remembered exposure to Sonic Youth. I heard Kool Thing on WBRU in Rhode Island in 1990 and that's what opened the door for me. Fond memories and I recall EXACTLY where I was at that moment. Going down Thames St. in Newport right by DryDock Seafood ! In ways Goo and Dirty are pretty straight forward rockers for SY, but they're just as loved by me as their other albums. Of course I have the Deluxe editions of both and have listened to the extra's more than the origininal discs the past couple of years. They're indispensable to me. I'll just have to revisit both original albums this evening, thanks for the thread.
__________________
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 01:36 PM | #15 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brantford, Canada
Posts: 1,843
|
Quote:
Yep. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 03:00 PM | #16 |
the destroyed room
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mid-Manhattan Library
Posts: 567
|
Reactions to Goo these days seem mixed. Some really love it. Some pick out it's perceived failures. Others fault it's old-fashioned production.
As for me, I like it by virtue of its relation to Dirty. This relation is a revelation for someone who never saw it before. Outside the super-fan commentary, Goo must seem a good representative album of Sonic Youth. It has the loose jams, the pop culture references and even the old-school hardcore throb of Mildred Pierce and others. What can you say? I guess everyone has their personal reaons for loving it or finding it a clunker. But I like the historical strand that runs through this thread. That's how I approach Goo, as a historical musical object. And lots of people commented on how it fits in the historical trajectory of Sonic Youth. Maybe the amazement of seeing SY on a major has faded and we can see Goo as a bridge from the 80's to the 90's. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 03:51 PM | #17 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,967
|
Goo rocks. mildred pierce is one of my all time faves. just noise and screaming. LOVE IT.
disappearer, MOTE, Mary Christ, fuck, I love so many songs on this album.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 08:20 PM | #18 |
the end of the ugly
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nowhere, NJ
Posts: 836
|
Didn't Steve say that someone ran this record through a "noise reduction machine?"
__________________
www.myspace.com/infinityad |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 10:33 PM | #19 |
empty page
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
|
Goo is a very legit album. In 2009.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.17.2009, 10:33 PM | #20 | |
empty page
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
YEAH!!!!! |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |